Pilo R, Cardash H S, Oz-Ari B, Ben-Amar A
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Oper Dent. 2001 Nov-Dec;26(6):569-75.
This study evaluated the effect of two dentin disinfectants (Consepsis, Tubulicid), one aqueous HEMA solution (Aqua Prep), a combination of Aqua Prep and Tubulicid and an air abrasion treatment (50 microns aluminum oxide) on the shear bond strength (SBS) of two acetone-based single bottle adhesives (One Step and Prime & Bond 2.1). The occlusal surfaces of 167 freshly extracted human third molars were ground flat to expose the dentin, then polished with a 600 grit-polishing disc. The teeth were randomly assigned to 12 test groups (two bonding agents, six pretreatment protocols). The exposed dentin was etched with 35% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds, rinsed and briefly (1-2 seconds) air dried. Six pretreatment protocols were then applied. The air abrasion groups were exceptional, as etching was carried out only after pretreatment. One Step, or Prime & Bond 2.1 was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cylinders of Z-100 composite were bonded to the flat dentin surfaces by transparent gelatin capsules. Specimens were thermocycled in water baths between 5 degrees and 55 degrees C, then sheared in an Instron Testing Machine. One-way and two-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD post-hoc tests were used for statistical analysis. In the One Step group, Consepsis yielded a significantly higher SBS (17.8 MPa) than air abrasion (9.5 MPa), Control (11.8 MPa) and Aqua Prep + Tubilicid (11.9 MPa), and a comparable SBS with Tubilicid (12.5 MPa) and Aqua Prep (14.8 MPa). In the Prime & Bond 2.1 group, Aqua Prep (24.9 MPa) showed a significantly higher SBS than all other groups: air abrasion (9.3 MPa), Control (9.97 MPa), Tubilicid (12.2 MPa), Consepsis (13.0 MPa) and Tubilicid + Aqua Prep (13.3 MPa).
本研究评估了两种牙本质消毒剂(Consepsis、Tubulicid)、一种水性甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯溶液(Aqua Prep)、Aqua Prep与Tubulicid的组合以及空气研磨处理(50微米氧化铝)对两种丙酮基单瓶粘结剂(One Step和Prime & Bond 2.1)剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。将167颗新鲜拔除的人类第三磨牙的咬合面磨平以暴露牙本质,然后用600目抛光盘进行抛光。牙齿被随机分为12个测试组(两种粘结剂,六种预处理方案)。将暴露的牙本质用35%磷酸蚀刻20秒,冲洗并短暂(1 - 2秒)空气干燥。然后应用六种预处理方案。空气研磨组是例外情况,因为仅在预处理后进行蚀刻。按照制造商的说明应用One Step或Prime & Bond 2.1。通过透明明胶胶囊将Z - 100复合树脂圆柱体粘结到平坦的牙本质表面。样本在5摄氏度至55摄氏度的水浴中进行热循环,然后在Instron测试机中进行剪切。使用单向和双向方差分析以及Tukey HSD事后检验进行统计分析。在One Step组中,Consepsis产生的SBS(17.8兆帕)显著高于空气研磨(9.5兆帕)、对照(11.8兆帕)和Aqua Prep + Tubilicid(11.9兆帕),并且与Tubilicid(12.5兆帕)和Aqua Prep(14.8兆帕)的SBS相当。在Prime & Bond 2.1组中,Aqua Prep(24.9兆帕)显示出的SBS显著高于所有其他组:空气研磨(9.3兆帕)、对照(9.97兆帕)、Tubilicid(12.2兆帕)、Consepsis(13.0兆帕)和Tubilicid + Aqua Prep(13.3兆帕)。