Elkassas Dina Wafik, Fawzi Elham Mostafa, El Zohairy Ahmed
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Misr International University, Cairo, Egypt.
Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Eur J Dent. 2014 Apr;8(2):184-190. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.130596.
This study was carried out to examine the effect of application of four different disinfecting agents on the micro-shear bond strength (μ-SBS) of an etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems.
One hundred flat dentin surfaces of human molars were produced by wet grinding the buccal surfaces. Specimens were randomly assigned to five groups according to the disinfectant used: Group I: Control (no disinfectant); Group II: 5.25% sodium hypochlorite based; Group III: 2% chlorhexidine based (Consepsis), Group IV: 0.1% benzalkoniumchloride based (Tubulicid red) and Group V: 3% doxycycline based (Biopure, MTAD). Specimens were bonded using either Adper Single Bond 2 or Clearfil S(3) Bond, which were employed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Resin composite microcylinders were bonded using Tygon(®) tubes for μ-SBS testing. The modes of failure were noted after visual examination using a binocular stereomicroscope at ×25 magnification. Failures were classified as adhesive, or mixed. μ-SBS results were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-hoc test.
Dentin disinfectants tested significantly negated the bonding of Adper Single bond 2 and the groups were ranked; Group I > Group V = Group IV > Group II = Group III, meanwhile they enhanced significantly the μ-SBS values upon using Clearfil S(3) Bond and were ranked; Group II > Group III = Group IV = Group V > Group I. Most failures were adhesive with the Adper single bond adhesive system. Mixed modes of failure were evident with Clearfil S(3) bond.
The disinfectants tested should not be used with Adper Single Bond 2 when applied before the etching step, However they could be used safely prior to bonding with Clearfil S(3) Bond.
本研究旨在探讨四种不同消毒剂对酸蚀冲洗和自酸蚀粘结系统微拉伸粘结强度(μ-SBS)的影响。
通过湿磨人类磨牙的颊面制备100个平坦的牙本质表面。根据使用的消毒剂将标本随机分为五组:第一组:对照组(不使用消毒剂);第二组:基于5.25%次氯酸钠;第三组:基于2%氯己定(Consepsis);第四组:基于0.1%苯扎氯铵(Tubulicid red);第五组:基于3%强力霉素(Biopure,MTAD)。使用Adper Single Bond 2或Clearfil S(3) Bond进行粘结,均按照制造商的说明使用。使用泰根(®)管粘结树脂复合材料微柱体以进行μ-SBS测试。使用25倍放大率的双目立体显微镜进行目视检查后记录失效模式。失效分为粘结性或混合性。使用双向方差分析和Tukey事后检验分析μ-SBS结果。
测试的牙本质消毒剂显著降低了Adper Single bond 2的粘结力,各组排序为:第一组>第五组 = 第四组>第二组 =第三组,同时在使用Clearfil S(3) Bond时它们显著提高了μ-SBS值,排序为:第二组>第三组 = 第四组 = 第五组>第一组。使用Adper single bond粘结系统时,大多数失效为粘结性。使用Clearfil S(3) bond时,混合失效模式明显。
在酸蚀步骤之前使用时,测试的消毒剂不应与Adper Single Bond 2一起使用,但是在与Clearfil S(3) Bond粘结之前可以安全使用。