Turssi C P, de Magalhães C S, Serra M C, Rodrigues Júnior A L
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Oper Dent. 2001 Nov-Dec;26(6):576-84.
This study evaluated the surface roughness pattern of resin-based restorative materials during brushing preceded by a regimen that simulated a dynamic pH-cycling. Restoratives included two resin composites (Renamel Microfill and Charisma), two polyacid-modified composite resins (Compoglass-F and Dyract AP) and one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji II LC Improved). Twenty standardized cylindrical specimens of each material were prepared according to a randomized complete block design. After finishing and polishing, the average surface roughness (Ra) and profile-length ratio (LR) of the specimens were determined. The experimental units were subjected to a pH-cycling regimen, and then to 10,000 brushing strokes. New readings of both the Ra and LR parameters were obtained. The same protocol of pH-cycling, brushing simulation and surface roughness measurements were repeated 10 times. Data was analyzed using ANOVA according to split-plot design and Tukey's test. Results showed the pH-cycling followed by 10,000 brushing strokes provided a remarkable increase in Ra for all restorative materials except for Renamel. Throughout the brushing simulation, Renamel, Charisma, Compoglass-F and Dyract AP showed steady textures, whereas Fuji II LC Improved exhibited a progressive increase in surface roughness. Among the materials tested, Renamel presented the smoothest surface, followed by Charisma and Compoglass-F, which did not differ from each other except at the baseline. Dyract AP was different from both these materials except at the baseline. Fuji II LC Improved had the roughest surface texture.
本研究评估了在模拟动态pH循环的方案预处理后,树脂基修复材料在刷牙过程中的表面粗糙度模式。修复材料包括两种树脂复合材料(Renamel微填料和卡瑞斯玛)、两种聚酸改性复合树脂(Compoglass-F和Dyract AP)以及一种树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀(富士II LC改进型)。根据随机完全区组设计制备每种材料的20个标准化圆柱形试件。完成修整和抛光后,测定试件的平均表面粗糙度(Ra)和轮廓长度比(LR)。对实验单元进行pH循环方案处理,然后进行10000次刷牙冲程。获得Ra和LR参数的新读数。将pH循环、刷牙模拟和表面粗糙度测量的相同方案重复10次。根据裂区设计使用方差分析和Tukey检验对数据进行分析。结果表明,除Renamel外,所有修复材料在经过10000次刷牙冲程的pH循环后,Ra均显著增加。在整个刷牙模拟过程中,Renamel、卡瑞斯玛、Compoglass-F和Dyract AP表现出稳定的质地,而富士II LC改进型的表面粗糙度逐渐增加。在所测试的材料中,Renamel的表面最光滑,其次是卡瑞斯玛和Compoglass-F,除基线外,它们之间没有差异。Dyract AP除基线外与这两种材料均不同。富士II LC改进型的表面质地最粗糙。