Bajwa Navroop Kaur, Pathak Anuradha
Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Punjab Civil Medical Services (Dental), Government of Punjab, House No. 1662, Sector 70, Mohali, Punjab 160071, India.
Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, House No. 5094, Phase 1, Urban Estate, Patiala, Punjab 147002, India.
ISRN Dent. 2014 Mar 23;2014:353926. doi: 10.1155/2014/353926. eCollection 2014.
Context. An in vitro study carried out to evaluate and compare the effect of Cola drink on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Purpose. To compare the effect of different immersion regimes in a Cola drink on surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Method. Two hundred samples were grouped into 4 equal groups of 50 samples each: Group I: conventional glass ionomer, Group II: resin modified glass ionomer, Group III: polyacid-modified resin composite, Group IV: Composite resin. Each group was further subdivided into 5 subgroups of 10 samples each. Subgroup A (Control Subgroup). Samples were kept immersed in artificial saliva. Subgroup B. Samples were immersed in Cola drink once a day. Subgroup C. Samples were immersed in Cola drink, 3 times a day. Subgroup D. Samples were immersed in Cola drink 5 times a day. Subgroup E. Samples were immersed in Cola drink 10 times a day. Each immersion lasted 5 minutes. The immersion protocol was repeated for 7 days. Results. Maximum surface roughness was seen in Group I conventional glass ionomer cement, followed by Group II resin modified glass ionomer, Group III polyacid modified resin composite, and Group IV composite resin samples. Conclusion. Resistance to change in surface roughness is more in resin based restorative materials as compared to glass ionomer based materials.
背景。开展一项体外研究以评估和比较可乐饮料对美学修复材料表面粗糙度的影响。目的。比较在可乐饮料中不同浸泡方式对美学修复材料表面粗糙度的影响。方法。200个样本被分成4个相等的组,每组50个样本:第一组:传统玻璃离子水门汀;第二组:树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀;第三组:聚酸改性树脂复合材料;第四组:复合树脂。每组再进一步细分为5个亚组,每组10个样本。A亚组(对照亚组)。样本浸泡在人工唾液中。B亚组。样本每天浸泡在可乐饮料中一次。C亚组。样本每天浸泡在可乐饮料中3次。D亚组。样本每天浸泡在可乐饮料中5次。E亚组。样本每天浸泡在可乐饮料中10次。每次浸泡持续5分钟。浸泡方案重复7天。结果。在第一组传统玻璃离子水门汀中观察到最大表面粗糙度,其次是第二组树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀、第三组聚酸改性树脂复合材料和第四组复合树脂样本。结论。与基于玻璃离子的材料相比,基于树脂的修复材料对表面粗糙度变化的抵抗力更强。