• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年反复故意自伤群体治疗的随机试验。

Randomized trial of group therapy for repeated deliberate self-harm in adolescents.

作者信息

Wood A, Trainor G, Rothwell J, Moore A, Harrington R

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Withington Hospital, South Manchester, England.

出版信息

J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;40(11):1246-53. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00004583-200111000-00003
PMID:11699797
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare group therapy with routine care in adolescents who had deliberately harmed themselves on at least two occasions within a year.

METHOD

Single-blind pilot study with two randomized parallel groups that took place in Manchester, England. Sixty-three adolescents aged 12 through 16 years were randomly assigned to group therapy and routine care or routine care alone. Outcome data on suicide attempts were obtained without knowledge of treatment allocation on all randomized cases (62/63 by direct interview) on average 29 weeks later. The primary outcomes were depression and suicidal behavior.

RESULTS

In intention-to-treat analyses, adolescents who had group therapy were less likely to be "repeaters" at the end of the study (i.e., to have repeated deliberate self-harm on two or more further occasions) than adolescents who had routine care (2/32 versus 10/31; odds ratio 6.3), but the confidence intervals for this ratio were wide (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 28.7). They were also less likely to use routine care, had better school attendance, and had a lower rate of behavioral disorder than adolescents given routine care alone. The interventions did not differ, however, in their effects on depression or global outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Group therapy shows promise as a treatment for adolescents who repeatedly harm themselves, but larger studies are required to assess more accurately the efficacy of this intervention.

摘要

目的

比较团体治疗与常规护理对一年内至少有两次蓄意自伤行为的青少年的效果。

方法

在英国曼彻斯特进行的一项单盲试点研究,设有两个随机平行组。63名年龄在12至16岁之间的青少年被随机分配接受团体治疗与常规护理或仅接受常规护理。在平均29周后,在不知道治疗分配情况的前提下,通过直接访谈获取了所有随机分组病例(62/63)的自杀未遂结果数据。主要结局指标为抑郁和自杀行为。

结果

在意向性分析中,接受团体治疗的青少年在研究结束时成为“重复者”(即再次出现两次或更多次蓄意自伤行为)的可能性低于接受常规护理的青少年(2/32 对比 10/31;优势比6.3),但该比例的置信区间较宽(95%置信区间1.4至28.7)。与仅接受常规护理的青少年相比,他们使用常规护理的可能性也更低,出勤率更高,行为障碍发生率更低。然而,两种干预措施在对抑郁或总体结局的影响方面并无差异。

结论

团体治疗对于反复自伤的青少年显示出有望成为一种治疗方法,但需要更大规模的研究来更准确地评估这种干预措施的疗效。

相似文献

1
Randomized trial of group therapy for repeated deliberate self-harm in adolescents.青少年反复故意自伤群体治疗的随机试验。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Nov;40(11):1246-53. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200111000-00003.
2
Repetition of deliberate self-harm by adolescents: the role of psychological factors.青少年故意自我伤害行为的重复:心理因素的作用。
J Adolesc. 1999 Jun;22(3):369-78. doi: 10.1006/jado.1999.0228.
3
Pathways from adolescent deliberate self-poisoning to early adult outcomes: a six-year follow-up.从青少年蓄意自我中毒到成年早期结局的路径:一项为期六年的随访研究
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 May;49(5):508-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01856.x. Epub 2008 Jan 21.
4
Group therapy for repeated deliberate self-harm in adolescents: failure of replication of a randomized trial.青少年反复故意自伤的团体治疗:一项随机试验的复制失败
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 Jun;48(6):662-670. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181aOacec.
5
Group therapy for adolescents with repeated self harm: randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation.重复自伤青少年的团体治疗:随机对照试验及经济评估。
BMJ. 2011 Apr 1;342:d682. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d682.
6
Preliminary data on an acceptance-based emotion regulation group intervention for deliberate self-harm among women with borderline personality disorder.针对边缘型人格障碍女性蓄意自我伤害行为的基于接纳的情绪调节团体干预的初步数据。
Behav Ther. 2006 Mar;37(1):25-35. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2005.03.002. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
7
Deliberate self-harm within an international community sample of young people: comparative findings from the Child & Adolescent Self-harm in Europe (CASE) Study.国际青年群体样本中的蓄意自伤行为:欧洲儿童与青少年自伤行为(CASE)研究的比较结果
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;49(6):667-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01879.x. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
8
Efficacy of breastfeeding support provided by trained clinicians during an early, routine, preventive visit: a prospective, randomized, open trial of 226 mother-infant pairs.在早期、常规、预防性访视期间,由经过培训的临床医生提供的母乳喂养支持的效果:一项针对226对母婴的前瞻性、随机、开放试验。
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):e139-46. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1362.
9
A step too far? Randomized trial of cognitive-behaviour therapy delivered by social workers to depressed adolescents.是否走得太远?社会工作者为抑郁青少年提供认知行为疗法的随机试验。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004 Apr;13(2):92-9. doi: 10.1007/s00787-004-0362-6.
10
Psychological subtyping finds pathological, impulsive, and 'normal' groups among adolescents who self-harm.心理分型在青少年自残群体中发现了病态、冲动和“正常”三类人群。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;50(7):807-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02067.x. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality in adolescents after therapeutic intervention for self-harm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.青少年自残治疗干预后的死亡率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
JCPP Adv. 2025 Jan 23. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12302.
2
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapeutic, pharmacological, and combination treatments for non-suicidal self-injury in children and adolescents: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.儿童和青少年非自杀性自伤的心理治疗、药物治疗及联合治疗的比较疗效与可接受性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 3;25(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12888-025-06735-1.
3
Efficacy of Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Relaxation Techniques in Cases with Attempted Suicide: An Original Research.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Feb;16(Suppl 1):S359-S361. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_575_23. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Suicide in young people: screening, risk assessment, and intervention.年轻人的自杀:筛查、风险评估和干预。
BMJ. 2023 Apr 24;381:e070630. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070630.
5
Family processes: Risk, protective and treatment factors for youth at risk for suicide.家庭因素:处于自杀风险中的青少年的风险、保护及治疗因素
Aggress Violent Behav. 2022 May-Jun;64. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2021.101586. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
6
Twenty-six years of psychosocial interventions to reduce suicide risk in adolescents: Systematic review and meta-analysis.26 年来减少青少年自杀风险的心理社会干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Mar 1;300:511-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.094. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
7
[Psychotherapy after a suicide attempt-current evidence and evaluation].自杀未遂后的心理治疗——当前证据与评估
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Jan;65(1):40-46. doi: 10.1007/s00103-021-03466-y. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
8
Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Psychotherapies for Self-harm and Suicidal Behavior Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.儿童和青少年自我伤害及自杀行为心理治疗的比较疗效与可接受性:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216614. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6614.
9
Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年自伤干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 7;3(3):CD013667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013667.pub2.
10
Development of a Clinical Pathway for the Assessment and Management of Suicidality on a Pediatric Psychiatric Inpatient Unit.儿科精神科住院病房自杀倾向评估与管理临床路径的制定
Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2020 Sep 24;11:123-133. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S240060. eCollection 2020.