• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童和青少年自我伤害及自杀行为心理治疗的比较疗效与可接受性:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析

Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Psychotherapies for Self-harm and Suicidal Behavior Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Bahji Anees, Pierce Matthew, Wong Jennifer, Roberge Johanne N, Ortega Iliana, Patten Scott

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216614. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6614.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6614
PMID:33861328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8052594/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Self-harm and suicidal behavior are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality among children and adolescents. The comparative performance of psychotherapies for suicidality is unclear because few head-to-head clinical trials have been conducted.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of psychotherapies for the treatment of self-harm and suicidality among children and adolescents.

DATA SOURCES

Four major bibliographic databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase) were searched for clinical trials comparing psychotherapy with control conditions from inception to September 2020.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials comparing psychotherapies for suicidality and/or self-harm with control conditions among children and adolescents were included after a blinded review by 3 independent reviewers (A.B., M.P., and J.W.).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline was followed for data abstraction, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate study-level risk of bias. Data abstraction was performed by 1 reviewer (A.B.) and confirmed by 2 independent blinded reviewers (J.W. and M.P.). Data were analyzed from October 15, 2020, to February 15, 2021.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were dichotomized self-harm and retention in treatment. The secondary outcomes were dichotomized all-cause treatment discontinuation and scores on instruments measuring suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms. Effect sizes were pooled using frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis models to generate summary odds ratios (ORs) and Cohen d standardized mean differences (SMDs). Negative Cohen d SMDs or ORs less than 1 indicated that the treatment reduced the parameter of interest relative to the control condition (eg, signifying a beneficial association with suicidal ideation).

RESULTS

The systematic search generated 1272 unique records. Of those, 44 randomized clinical trials (5406 total participants; 4109 female participants [76.0%]) from 49 articles were selected (5 follow-up studies were merged with their primary clinical trials to avoid publication bias). The selected clinical trials spanned January 1, 1995, to December 31, 2020. The median duration of treatment was 3 months (range, 0.25-12.00 months), and the median follow-up period was 12 months (range, 1-36 months). None of the investigated psychotherapies were associated with increases in study withdrawals or improvements in retention in treatment compared with treatment as usual. Dialectical behavioral therapies were associated with reductions in self-harm (OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.64) and suicidal ideation (Cohen d SMD, -0.71; 95% CI, -1.19 to -0.23) at the end of treatment, while mentalization-based therapies were associated with decreases in self-harm (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.15-0.97) and suicidal ideation (Cohen d SMD, -1.22; 95% CI, -2.18 to -0.26) at the end of follow-up. The quality of evidence was downgraded because of high risk of bias overall, heterogeneity, publication bias, inconsistency, and imprecision.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Although some psychotherapeutic modalities appear to be acceptable and efficacious for reducing self-harm and suicidality among children and adolescents, methodological issues and high risk of bias prevent a consistent estimate of their comparative performance.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94e2/8052594/d45427117137/jamanetwopen-e216614-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94e2/8052594/5deb08f5d397/jamanetwopen-e216614-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94e2/8052594/43ade5569aca/jamanetwopen-e216614-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94e2/8052594/d45427117137/jamanetwopen-e216614-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94e2/8052594/5deb08f5d397/jamanetwopen-e216614-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94e2/8052594/43ade5569aca/jamanetwopen-e216614-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94e2/8052594/d45427117137/jamanetwopen-e216614-g003.jpg
摘要

重要性

自我伤害和自杀行为与儿童及青少年的高发病率和死亡率相关。由于几乎没有进行过直接比较的临床试验,因此心理治疗对自杀倾向的相对疗效尚不清楚。

目的

比较心理治疗对儿童及青少年自我伤害和自杀倾向的治疗效果。

数据来源

检索了四个主要的文献数据库(PubMed、MEDLINE、PsycINFO和Embase),以查找从数据库建立至2020年9月期间比较心理治疗与对照情况的临床试验。

研究选择

由3名独立评审员(A.B.、M.P.和J.W.)进行盲审后,纳入比较儿童及青少年自杀倾向和/或自我伤害的心理治疗与对照情况的随机临床试验。

数据提取与综合

数据提取遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)报告指南,并使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究层面的偏倚风险。数据提取由1名评审员(A.B.)完成,并由2名独立的盲审员(J.W.和M.P.)确认。数据分析于2020年10月15日至2021年2月15日进行。

主要结局和指标

主要结局为自我伤害的二分法和治疗保留率。次要结局为全因治疗中断的二分法以及测量自杀意念和抑郁症状的工具得分。效应量使用频率学派随机效应网络Meta分析模型进行合并,以生成汇总比值比(OR)和Cohen d标准化均数差(SMD)。负的Cohen d SMD或小于1的OR表明,相对于对照情况,该治疗降低了感兴趣的参数(例如,表示与自杀意念存在有益关联)。

结果

系统检索共获得1272条独特记录。其中,从49篇文章中选取了44项随机临床试验(共5406名参与者;4109名女性参与者[76.0%])(5项随访研究与其主要临床试验合并,以避免发表偏倚)。所选临床试验涵盖1995年1月1日至2020年12月31日。治疗的中位持续时间为3个月(范围:0.25 - 12.00个月),中位随访期为12个月(范围:1 - 36个月)。与常规治疗相比,所研究的心理治疗均未导致研究退出增加或治疗保留率改善。辩证行为疗法与治疗结束时自我伤害的减少(OR = 0.28;95%CI:0.12 - 0.64)和自杀意念的减少(Cohen d SMD = -0.71;95%CI:-1.19至-0.23)相关,而基于心理化的疗法与随访结束时自我伤害的减少(OR = 0.38;95%CI:0.15 - 0.97)和自杀意念的减少(Cohen d SMD = -1.22;95%CI:-2.18至-0.

相似文献

1
Comparative Efficacy and Acceptability of Psychotherapies for Self-harm and Suicidal Behavior Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.儿童和青少年自我伤害及自杀行为心理治疗的比较疗效与可接受性:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216614. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.6614.
2
Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年自伤干预。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 7;3(3):CD013667. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013667.pub2.
3
Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年自我伤害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 21;2015(12):CD012013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012013.
4
Efficacy of Psychotherapies for Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.心理治疗对边缘型人格障碍的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 1;74(4):319-328. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.4287.
5
Psychotherapies for Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.成人广泛性焦虑障碍的心理治疗:随机临床试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 1;81(3):250-259. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.3971.
6
Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Suicidal Ideation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.基于互联网的认知行为疗法降低自杀意念:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203933. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3933.
7
Different Types and Acceptability of Psychotherapies for Acute Anxiety Disorders in Children and Adolescents: A Network Meta-analysis.儿童和青少年急性焦虑障碍的不同类型和可接受性的心理治疗:网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Jan 1;76(1):41-50. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3070.
8
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychotherapies, and their combination for acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药、心理治疗及其联合应用对儿童和青少年抑郁症急性治疗的比较疗效和可接受性:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jul;7(7):581-601. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30137-1.
9
Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Antipsychotics for Juvenile Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.抗精神病药治疗青少年精神病性障碍的疗效和耐受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2022;42(2):198-208. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0000000000001506.
10
Prevalence and Correlates of Suicide and Nonsuicidal Self-injury in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.儿童自杀和非自杀性自伤的流行率及相关因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 1;79(7):718-726. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.1256.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Individual, Group, Family and Combined Therapy Formats on Suicidality: A Meta-Analysis.个体、团体、家庭及综合治疗模式对自杀倾向的比较效果:一项荟萃分析
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2025 Jul-Aug;32(4):e70112. doi: 10.1002/cpp.70112.
2
Profiles of caregiver burden among adolescents with non-suicidal self-injury: a latent profile analysis.非自杀性自伤青少年的照顾者负担概况:一项潜在类别分析
Front Psychiatry. 2025 May 19;16:1581640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1581640. eCollection 2025.
3
Descriptive analysis of 1,048 presentations in the first five years of a zero-suicide framework in a child and youth mental health service in Australia.

本文引用的文献

1
Association of Cannabis Use With Self-harm and Mortality Risk Among Youths With Mood Disorders.大麻使用与心境障碍青少年的自伤和死亡风险的关联。
JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Apr 1;175(4):377-384. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.5494.
2
Psychological therapies for adolescents with borderline personality disorder (BPD) or BPD features-A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.青少年边缘型人格障碍(BPD)或 BPD 特征的心理治疗 - 随机临床试验的系统评价与荟萃分析和试验序贯分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 14;16(1):e0245331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245331. eCollection 2021.
3
对澳大利亚一家儿童和青少年心理健康服务机构在零自杀框架实施的头五年里的1048份报告进行的描述性分析。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 4;15:1437016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1437016. eCollection 2024.
4
An Umbrella Review of Cognitive Behavioural and Dialectical Behavioural Therapies to Treat Self-Harm and Suicidal Behaviour in Adolescents.认知行为疗法和辩证行为疗法治疗青少年自残和自杀行为的伞式评价
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2024 Aug;52(4):549-560. doi: 10.62641/aep.v52i4.1631.
5
Dynamic Deconstructive Psychotherapy for Suicidal Adolescents: Effectiveness of Routine Care in an Outpatient Clinic.动态解构心理疗法治疗青少年自杀:门诊常规护理的疗效。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jul 16;21(7):929. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21070929.
6
Acceptability, use and safety of the BlueIce self-harm prevention app: qualitative findings from the Beating Adolescent Self-Harm (BASH) randomised controlled trial.《BlueIce 自伤预防应用程序的可接受性、使用情况和安全性:Beating Adolescent Self-Harm(BASH)随机对照试验的定性结果》。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Jun 25;27(1):e300961. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300961.
7
The Impact of a One-Day Workshop on Good Psychiatric Management for Adolescent (GPM-A) Borderline Personality Disorder.为期一天的青少年边缘型人格障碍良好精神科管理(GPM-A)工作坊的影响。
Acad Psychiatry. 2024 Aug;48(4):346-350. doi: 10.1007/s40596-024-01984-w. Epub 2024 May 23.
8
Outpatient care for adolescents' and young adults' mental health: promoting self- and others' understanding through a metacognitive interpersonal therapy-informed psychological intervention.青少年和青年心理健康的门诊护理:通过基于元认知人际治疗的心理干预促进自我和他人理解。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 2;14:1221158. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1221158. eCollection 2023.
9
Efficacy comparison of 21 interventions to prevent retinopathy of prematurity: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.21 种干预措施预防早产儿视网膜病变的疗效比较:随机对照试验的贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Eye (Lond). 2024 Apr;38(5):877-884. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02796-2. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
10
Parent and Carer Skills Groups in Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for High-Risk Adolescents with Severe Emotion Dysregulation: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Participants' Outcomes and Experiences.父母和照顾者技能小组在针对严重情绪失调的高风险青少年的辩证行为治疗中的应用:对参与者结果和经验的混合方法评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jul 10;20(14):6334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20146334.
Comparative Efficacy and Tolerability of Adjunctive Pharmacotherapies for Acute Bipolar Depression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
辅助治疗急性双相抑郁的疗效和耐受性比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Can J Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;66(3):274-288. doi: 10.1177/0706743720970857. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
4
Comparative efficacy of racemic ketamine and esketamine for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis.消旋卡前列素与依他佐辛治疗抑郁症的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Jan 1;278:542-555. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.071. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
The relative effectiveness of psychotherapeutic techniques and delivery modalities for chronic pain: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.心理治疗技术和治疗方式对慢性疼痛的相对有效性:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析方案
HRB Open Res. 2020 Aug 17;2:25. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12953.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Efficacy and acceptability of cannabinoids for anxiety disorders in adults: A systematic review & meta-analysis.大麻素对成人焦虑症的疗效与可接受性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Psychiatr Res. 2020 Oct;129:257-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.07.030. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
7
Suicidal behaviours among adolescents from 90 countries: a pooled analysis of the global school-based student health survey.90 个国家青少年的自杀行为:全球基于学校的学生健康调查的 pooled 分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 10;20(1):1102. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09209-z.
8
Does treatment method matter? A meta-analysis of the past 20 years of research on therapeutic interventions for self-harm and suicidal ideation in adolescents.治疗方法重要吗?对过去20年青少年自我伤害和自杀意念治疗干预研究的荟萃分析。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2020 May 11;7:9. doi: 10.1186/s40479-020-00123-9. eCollection 2020.
9
Mentalization-based treatment in groups for adolescents with Borderline Personality Disorder: 3- and 12-month follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.基于心理化的团体治疗对边缘型人格障碍青少年的疗效:一项随机对照试验的 3 个月和 12 个月随访研究。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2021 May;30(5):699-710. doi: 10.1007/s00787-020-01551-2. Epub 2020 May 9.
10
Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.针对边缘型人格障碍患者的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5(5):CD012955. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012955.pub2.