• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用健康结果数据为决策提供信息:政府机构视角

Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: government agency perspective.

作者信息

Taylor R

机构信息

Department of Public Health & Epidemiology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, England.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19 Suppl 2:33-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119002-00006.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-200119002-00006
PMID:11700787
Abstract

In the developed world, the demand for healthcare is rising faster than supply, so that governments are faced with the need to allocate limited resources for maximum benefit. Many governments are responding to these pressures by developing health technology assessment agencies, which evaluate the cost effectiveness of new pharmaceutical and medical products relative to existing interventions. In England and Wales, the agency concerned with health technology assessment is the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). NICE brings together evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness to judge the value of the treatment relative to alternative uses of National Health Service (NHS) resources and makes recommendations on use of the treatment by the NHS in England and Wales. NICE evaluates technologies where they may result in significant impact on NHS resources or key healthcare policy. The health technology assessment includes a review of the clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and service impact of the technology under consideration. This health technology assessment report, together with submissions from the technology manufacturer, and patient and healthcare professionals groups, is then considered by an appraisal committee that formulates guidance to the NHS and is ultimately published by NICE. A number of countries have formal guidelines on the use of outcome measures and economic evaluations in the submissions required for health technology assessment prior to market access. These guidelines vary in both the detail and level of mandatory requirement to be followed by technology manufacturers. NICE has recently updated its guidance to technology manufacturers on their submissions. These guidelines, developed in consultation with the healthcare industry, provide detailed specification of the requirements of NICE for health outcomes data and economic evaluation. These details are described in more detail in this paper.

摘要

在发达国家,医疗保健需求的增长速度超过了供应速度,因此政府面临着为实现最大效益而分配有限资源的需求。许多政府通过设立卫生技术评估机构来应对这些压力,这些机构评估新药品和医疗产品相对于现有干预措施的成本效益。在英格兰和威尔士,负责卫生技术评估的机构是国家临床优化研究所(NICE)。NICE综合临床和成本效益证据,以判断该治疗相对于国民保健制度(NHS)资源的其他用途的价值,并就NHS在英格兰和威尔士使用该治疗提出建议。NICE对可能对NHS资源或关键医疗政策产生重大影响的技术进行评估。卫生技术评估包括对所考虑技术的临床有效性、成本效益和服务影响进行审查。然后,评估委员会会审议这份卫生技术评估报告,以及技术制造商、患者和医疗专业人员团体提交的材料,评估委员会会制定针对NHS的指南,最终由NICE发布。一些国家在市场准入前的卫生技术评估所需提交材料中,对结果指标的使用和经济评估有正式指南。这些指南在技术制造商需遵循的详细程度和强制要求水平方面各不相同。NICE最近更新了对技术制造商提交材料的指南。这些指南是在与医疗行业协商后制定的,详细说明了NICE对健康结果数据和经济评估的要求。本文将更详细地描述这些细节。

相似文献

1
Using health outcomes data to inform decision-making: government agency perspective.利用健康结果数据为决策提供信息:政府机构视角
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19 Suppl 2:33-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119002-00006.
2
Evidence Review Group approaches to the critical appraisal of manufacturer submissions for the NICE STA process: a mapping study and thematic analysis.证据审查组对 NICE STA 流程中制造商提交材料进行关键评估的方法:一项映射研究和主题分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 May;15(22):1-82, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta15220.
3
The use of economic evaluations in NHS decision-making: a review and empirical investigation.国民健康服务体系决策中经济评估的应用:一项综述与实证研究
Health Technol Assess. 2008 Apr;12(7):iii, ix-x, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta12070.
4
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
5
NICE methodological guidelines and decision making in the National Health Service in England and Wales.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中的英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)方法学指南及决策制定
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(3):149-57. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321030-00001.
6
Informing a decision framework for when NICE should recommend the use of health technologies only in the context of an appropriately designed programme of evidence development.为 NICE 何时应仅在适当设计的证据开发计划背景下推荐使用卫生技术制定决策框架提供信息。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(46):1-323. doi: 10.3310/hta16460.
7
The role of NICE technology appraisal in NHS rationing.英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所技术评估在英国国民医疗服务体系资源分配中的作用。
Br Med Bull. 2007;81-82:51-64. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldm007. Epub 2007 Apr 4.
8
[More care for a limited budget; a case for a better use of the efficiency criteria].在预算有限的情况下提供更多关怀;关于更好运用效率标准的一个案例
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Nov 23;146(47):2254-8.
9
Developing the revised NICE appraisal technical guidance to manufacturers and sponsors: opportunity or threat?向制造商和赞助商发布修订后的英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所评估技术指南:机遇还是威胁?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(15):1031-8. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220150-00001.
10
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-utility of Protocols of BFM-ALL and UK-ALL for Treatment of Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Iran.伊朗用于治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病儿童的BFM-ALL和UK-ALL方案的成本效益分析
Iran J Public Health. 2018 Mar;47(3):407-412.
2
Questionnaire survey for the development and publication of cancer clinical practice guidelines in Japan.日本癌症临床实践指南制定与发布的问卷调查
Int J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct;19(5):771-8. doi: 10.1007/s10147-014-0715-1. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
3
Mapping the FACT-G cancer-specific quality of life instrument to the EQ-5D and SF-6D.

本文引用的文献

1
Problems with the interpretation of pharmacoeconomic analyses: a review of submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.药物经济学分析解读中的问题:对澳大利亚药品福利计划提交材料的综述
JAMA. 2000 Apr 26;283(16):2116-21. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.16.2116.
2
How well do doctors and nurses work together?医生和护士之间的协作情况如何?
Nurs Times. 1999;95(33):3.
3
Early warning of new health care technologies in the United Kingdom.英国新医疗技术的早期预警。
将 FACT-G 癌症特异性生活质量量表映射到 EQ-5D 和 SF-6D 上。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Dec 1;11:203. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-203.
4
Lean systems approaches to health technology assessment: a patient-focused alternative to cost-effectiveness analysis.精益系统方法在卫生技术评估中的应用:一种以患者为中心的成本效益分析替代方法。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006 Dec;24 Suppl 2:101-9. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624002-00011.
5
A review of health utilities across conditions common in paediatric and adult populations.对儿科和成人常见疾病的健康效用进行综述。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jan 27;8:12. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-12.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998 Fall;14(4):680-6. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300011995.