Whited J D
Institute for Clinical and Epidemiologic Research, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Am J Clin Dermatol. 2001;2(2):59-64. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200102020-00001.
Teledermatology is becoming an increasingly common means of delivering dermatologic healthcare worldwide and will almost certainly play a greater role in the future. The type of technology used distinguishes the 2 modes of teledermatology consultation. The store and forward technique uses still digital images generated by a digital camera. Consultations of this type are considered asynchronous since the images are obtained, sent, and reviewed at different times. In contrast, real-time interactive consultations are synchronous. Patients and clinicians interact in real-time through an audio-video communication link. Each modality has its advantages and disadvantages, and studies appear in the literature that assess both technologies. Although diagnostic reliability (precision) assessments for teledermatology are subject to limitations, existing information indicates that both store and forward and real-time interactive technology result in reliable diagnostic outcomes when compared with clinic-based evaluations. Less information regarding diagnostic accuracy is available; however, one evaluation that used store and forward technology found comparable diagnostic accuracy between teledermatology consultations and clinic-based examinations. Currently, little information is available regarding cost effectiveness and patient outcomes. Existing evidence, while inconclusive, suggests that teledermatology may be more costly than traditional clinic-based care, especially when using real-time interactive technology. Teledermatology has been shown to have utility as a triage mechanism for determining the urgency or need for a clinic-based consultation. Overall, patients appear to accept teledermatology and are satisfied with it as a means of obtaining healthcare. Clinicians have also generally reported positive experiences with teledermatology. Future studies that focus on cost effectiveness, patient outcomes, and patient and clinician satisfaction will help further define the potential of teledermatology as a means of dermatologic healthcare delivery.
远程皮肤病学正在成为全球提供皮肤病医疗保健的一种越来越普遍的方式,而且几乎可以肯定在未来将发挥更大的作用。所使用的技术类型区分了远程皮肤病学咨询的两种模式。存储转发技术使用数码相机生成的静态数字图像。这种类型的咨询被认为是异步的,因为图像是在不同时间获取、发送和审查的。相比之下,实时交互式咨询是同步的。患者和临床医生通过音频视频通信链接进行实时互动。每种模式都有其优点和缺点,文献中也出现了评估这两种技术的研究。尽管远程皮肤病学的诊断可靠性(准确性)评估存在局限性,但现有信息表明,与基于诊所的评估相比,存储转发和实时交互式技术都能产生可靠的诊断结果。关于诊断准确性的信息较少;然而,一项使用存储转发技术的评估发现,远程皮肤病学咨询与基于诊所的检查之间的诊断准确性相当。目前,关于成本效益和患者结果的信息很少。现有证据虽然尚无定论,但表明远程皮肤病学可能比传统的基于诊所的护理成本更高,尤其是在使用实时交互式技术时。远程皮肤病学已被证明作为一种分诊机制,用于确定基于诊所咨询的紧迫性或必要性是有用的。总体而言,患者似乎接受远程皮肤病学,并对其作为获得医疗保健的一种方式感到满意。临床医生通常也报告了在远程皮肤病学方面的积极经历。未来关注成本效益、患者结果以及患者和临床医生满意度的研究将有助于进一步确定远程皮肤病学作为皮肤病医疗保健提供方式的潜力。