Clyman B
VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System, 534 Hillgreen Drive, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, USA.
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2001 Dec;3(6):520-3. doi: 10.1007/s11926-001-0067-5.
Few medical professionals would dispute the obvious health benefits afforded by regular exercise if pursued judiciously and in moderation. Cardiovascular disease, hypertension, osteoporosis, diabetes, depression, and fibromyalgia are a few of the many disorders in which exercise plays a key role in management. Less well-appreciated until recently is the beneficial effect exercise may have in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA). Previously, rest and inactivity seemed to be the prevailing treatment strategy until it was recognized that this approach was ineffective and contributed further to the patient's disability and loss of function. New trial data support the value of physical exercise whether it involves aerobic or resistance-type training. The studies are not without statistical and methodologic imperfections. Still, the evidence favoring an exercise intervention as part of the OA treatment plan is impressive. It remains for the clinician to select an appropriate exercise routine that meets the strength, balance, flexibility, and aerobic needs of the patient. The clinician then monitors and evaluates the patient's response to this activity with the same exactness used in following pharmacologic therapy.
如果明智且适度地进行定期锻炼,很少有医学专业人士会质疑其明显的健康益处。心血管疾病、高血压、骨质疏松症、糖尿病、抑郁症和纤维肌痛只是众多疾病中的一部分,在这些疾病的管理中,运动起着关键作用。直到最近,运动对骨关节炎(OA)治疗可能产生的有益效果才得到较少的认可。以前,休息和不活动似乎是主要的治疗策略,直到人们认识到这种方法无效,并且会进一步导致患者残疾和功能丧失。新的试验数据支持体育锻炼的价值,无论它是有氧训练还是阻力型训练。这些研究并非没有统计和方法上的缺陷。尽管如此,支持将运动干预作为OA治疗计划一部分的证据令人印象深刻。临床医生仍需选择一种合适的锻炼方案,以满足患者的力量、平衡、灵活性和有氧需求。然后,临床医生会像监测和评估药物治疗一样,精确地监测和评估患者对这种活动的反应。