Young W B, McDowell M H, Scarlett B J
School of Human Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
J Strength Cond Res. 2001 Aug;15(3):315-9.
The purpose of this study was to determine if straight sprint training transferred to agility performance tests that involved various change-of-direction complexities and if agility training transferred to straight sprinting speed. Thirty-six males were tested on a 30-m straight sprint and 6 agility tests with 2-5 changes of direction at various angles. The subjects participated in 2 training sessions per week for 6 weeks using 20-40-m straight sprints (speed) or 20-40-m change-of-direction sprints (3-5 changes of 100 degrees) (agility). After the training period, the subjects were retested, and the speed training resulted in significant improvements (p < 0.05) in straight sprinting speed but limited gains in the agility tests. Generally, the more complex the agility task, the less the transfer from the speed training to the agility task. Conversely, the agility training resulted in significant improvements in the change-of-direction tests (p < 0.05) but no significant improvement (p > 0.05) in straight sprint performance. We concluded that straight speed and agility training methods are specific and produce limited transfer to the other. These findings have implications for the design of speed and agility training and testing protocols.
本研究的目的是确定直线冲刺训练是否能迁移至涉及不同变向复杂性的敏捷性测试中,以及敏捷性训练是否能迁移至直线冲刺速度。36名男性接受了30米直线冲刺测试和6项敏捷性测试,这些测试包含2至5次不同角度的变向。受试者每周参加2次训练课程,为期6周,训练内容为20至40米的直线冲刺(速度训练)或20至40米的变向冲刺(100度的3至5次变向)(敏捷性训练)。训练期结束后,对受试者进行重新测试,结果显示速度训练使直线冲刺速度有显著提高(p < 0.05),但在敏捷性测试中的提升有限。一般来说,敏捷性任务越复杂,从速度训练到敏捷性任务的迁移就越少。相反地,敏捷性训练使变向测试有显著改善(p < 0.05),但直线冲刺成绩没有显著提高(p > 0.05)。我们得出结论,直线速度训练和敏捷性训练方法具有特异性,且相互间的迁移有限。这些发现对速度和敏捷性训练及测试方案的设计具有启示意义。