Ayoub I M, Brown D J, Gazmuri R J
Medical Service, Section of Critical Care Medicine, North Chicago VA Medical Center and Department of Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Finch University of Health Sciences/The Chicago Medical School, North Chicago, IL 60064, USA.
Chest. 2001 Nov;120(5):1663-70. doi: 10.1378/chest.120.5.1663.
Because efforts to secure adequate arterial oxygenation during cardiac resuscitation are more important than efforts to promote CO(2) elimination, we investigated whether continuous transtracheal oxygenation (TTO) could represent a potentially simpler alternative to conventional positive-pressure ventilation with 100% O(2) through an endotracheal tube.
Controlled and randomized.
Animal laboratory.
Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats.
The technique for TTO was initially developed and tested in five rats. A model of ventricular fibrillation (VF) was then used to compare the effects of TTO (n = 5) with the effects of O(2) delivery through an endotracheal tube as part of positive-pressure ventilation (n = 5) or through a mask without additional airway intervention (n = 5). VF was induced and left untreated for 4 min, after which chest compression and one of the three oxygenation interventions was started. Defibrillation was attempted after 6 min of chest compression. In a subsequent series, defibrillation was attempted after 10 min of chest compression in rats treated with either TTO (n = 5) or endotracheal intubation (ET; n = 5).
TTO and ET secured adequate arterial PO(2) during chest compression (213 +/- 77 mm Hg and 154 +/- 36 mm Hg; not significant), whereas the mask yielded an arterial PO(2) of only 49 +/- 38 mm Hg (p < 0.05). Each rat treated with TTO or ET was successfully resuscitated and survived the postresuscitation interval, but none of the rats treated with the mask survived. TTO maintained its efficacy after increased duration of chest compression.
TTO was as effective as conventional positive-pressure ventilation with 100% O(2) for securing oxygenation, resuscitation, and short-term survival and more effective than O(2) delivered through a mask.
由于在心脏复苏过程中确保充足的动脉氧合比促进二氧化碳排出更为重要,我们研究了持续经气管给氧(TTO)是否可作为通过气管插管进行100%氧气常规正压通气的一种潜在更简单的替代方法。
对照和随机。
动物实验室。
30只雄性斯普拉格-道利大鼠。
TTO技术最初在5只大鼠中开发并测试。然后使用室颤(VF)模型比较TTO(n = 5)与通过气管插管作为正压通气一部分给氧(n = 5)或通过面罩给氧且无额外气道干预(n = 5)的效果。诱发VF并使其未经处理4分钟,之后开始胸外按压并进行三种氧合干预之一。胸外按压6分钟后尝试除颤。在随后的系列实验中,对接受TTO(n = 5)或气管插管(ET;n = 5)治疗的大鼠,在胸外按压10分钟后尝试除颤。
胸外按压期间,TTO和ET均能确保充足的动脉血氧分压(分别为213±77 mmHg和154±36 mmHg;无显著差异),而面罩给氧时动脉血氧分压仅为49±38 mmHg(p < 0.05)。接受TTO或ET治疗的每只大鼠均成功复苏并在复苏后存活,但接受面罩给氧治疗的大鼠无一存活。胸外按压时间延长后,TTO仍保持其有效性。
TTO在确保氧合、复苏和短期存活方面与100%氧气常规正压通气同样有效,且比通过面罩给氧更有效。