Suppr超能文献

在筛查幼儿尿路感染时,我们应该摒弃标准显微镜检查法吗?

Should we abandon standard microscopy when screening for urinary tract infections in young children?

作者信息

Armengol C E, Hendley J O, Schlager T A

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2001 Dec;20(12):1176-7. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200112000-00018.

Abstract

Dipstick analysis is a screening test for urinary tract infection (UTI) in office practice. Standard urine microscopy is available offsite. We evaluated the usefulness of these tests on consecutive urine samples obtained by bladder catheterization in young children with a possible UTI. Thirty of 230 children had positive cultures. Dipstick analysis was specific (98%) but not sensitive (70%). Standard microscopy was not specific. Dipstick analysis and urine culture are useful tests for the diagnosis of UTI.

摘要

试纸分析是门诊实践中用于筛查尿路感染(UTI)的一项检查。标准尿液显微镜检查可在外部机构进行。我们评估了这些检查对通过膀胱导尿获取的连续尿液样本在可能患有UTI的幼儿中的实用性。230名儿童中有30名培养结果呈阳性。试纸分析特异性高(98%)但敏感性低(70%)。标准显微镜检查特异性不强。试纸分析和尿培养是诊断UTI的有用检查。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验