Suppr超能文献

死亡率定义对医院概况的影响。

Effect of definition of mortality on hospital profiles.

作者信息

Johnson Michael L, Gordon Howard S, Petersen Nancy J, Wray Nelda P, Shroyer A Laurie, Grover Frederick L, Geraci Jane M

机构信息

Houston VA Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Texas 77030, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2002 Jan;40(1):7-16. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200201000-00003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hospitals are ranked based on risk-adjusted measures of postoperative mortality, but definitions differ about which deaths following surgery should be included.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether varying the case definition of deaths following surgery that are included in coronary artery bypass surgery quality assessment affects the identification of outlier hospitals.

RESEARCH DESIGN

The study used a prospective cohort design.

SUBJECTS

A total of 15,288 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery without other cardiac procedures from October 1993 to March 1996 at all (N = 43) Veterans Affairs hospitals that conduct cardiac surgery.

MEASURES

The first measure included any death occurring within 30 days after surgery, regardless of cause, in or out of the hospital (30-day mortality). The second measure included 30-day mortality plus any death occurring 30 days to 6 months after surgery that was judged to be a direct result of a perioperative complication of the surgery (all procedure-related mortality).

RESULTS

Hospital performance as assessed by the two different definitions of death varied substantially. The rankings of hospitals differed for 86% (37/43) of hospitals. Twenty-one percent (9/43) changed their quartile of rank, and five hospitals changed their outlier status. The correlation of observed-to-expected ratios was high (r = 0.96), but there was disagreement of outlier status (kappa = 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Judgments regarding the quality of a hospital's performance of coronary artery bypass surgery vary depending on the definition of postoperative mortality that is used. Further research is needed to assess what definition is most appropriate to identify quality of care problems.

摘要

背景

医院是根据术后死亡率的风险调整指标进行排名的,但对于哪些术后死亡应被纳入存在不同定义。

目的

确定在冠状动脉搭桥手术质量评估中纳入的术后死亡病例定义的变化是否会影响对异常值医院的识别。

研究设计

本研究采用前瞻性队列设计。

研究对象

1993年10月至1996年3月期间,在所有(N = 43)开展心脏手术的退伍军人事务医院中,共有15288例接受冠状动脉搭桥手术且未进行其他心脏手术的患者。

测量指标

第一个指标包括术后30天内发生的任何死亡,无论原因如何,无论在医院内还是医院外(30天死亡率)。第二个指标包括30天死亡率加上术后30天至6个月内发生的任何被判定为手术围手术期并发症直接结果的死亡(所有与手术相关的死亡率)。

结果

根据两种不同的死亡定义评估的医院表现差异很大。86%(37/43)的医院排名不同。21%(9/43)的医院改变了其排名四分位数,5家医院改变了其异常值状态。观察到的与预期的比率相关性很高(r = 0.96),但异常值状态存在分歧(kappa = 0.71)。

结论

关于医院冠状动脉搭桥手术表现质量的判断因所使用的术后死亡率定义而异。需要进一步研究以评估哪种定义最适合识别护理质量问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验