Schoenberg Stefan O, Knopp Michael V, Londy Frank, Krishnan Sumati, Zuna Ivan, Lang Nicole, Essig Marco, Hawighorst Hans, Maki Jeffrey H, Stafford-Johnson David, Kallinowski Friedrich, Chenevert Thomas L, Prince Martin R
*Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (dkfz), and Department of Surgery, University Hospitals, Heidelberg, Germany; and Department of Radiology, Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Jan;13(1):158-169. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V131158.
The effect of combined morphologic and functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging on the interobserver and intermodality variability for the grading of renal artery stenosis is assessed. In a randomized, blinded tricenter analysis, seven readers evaluated 43 renal arteries on x-ray digital subtraction angiography (DSA), 3D-Gadolinium MR angiography (3D-Gd-MRA), cine phase-contrast flow measurement (PC-flow), and a combined analysis of the last two. Interobserver variability was assessed for the grading of renal artery stenosis as well as regional vessel visibility. Intermodality variability for stenosis grading was analyzed in cases in which the readers agreed on the degree of stenosis in DSA. DSA had a substantial interobserver variability for the grading of stenosis (mean kappa kappa 0.64). 3D-Gd-MRA revealed a slightly improved interobserver variability but incorrectly graded 6 of 34 stenoses on a two-point scale (<50%, > or =50%). The combined approach of 3D-Gd-MRA and PC-flow revealed the best (P = 0.0003) interobserver variability (median kappa = 0.75) and almost perfect intermodality agreement with DSA (97% of cases). These findings were confirmed in a prospective analysis of 97 renal arteries. The vessel visibility of the renal artery ostium was significantly better in 3D-Gd-MRA than in DSA, whereas the visibility of the hilar and intrarenal vessels was significantly worse (P = 0.0001). A combined morphologic and functional MR examination significantly reduces interobserver variability and offers reliable and reproducible grading of renal artery stenosis based on stenosis morphology and hemodynamic changes. It can be considered a safe and noninvasive alternative for diagnostic DSA in cases that do not require assessment of intrarenal vessels.
评估形态学和功能磁共振(MR)成像相结合对肾动脉狭窄分级的观察者间和模态间变异性的影响。在一项随机、盲法三中心分析中,7名阅片者对43条肾动脉进行了X线数字减影血管造影(DSA)、三维钆增强磁共振血管造影(3D-Gd-MRA)、电影相位对比血流测量(PC-flow)以及后两者的联合分析。评估了观察者间在肾动脉狭窄分级以及区域血管可视性方面的变异性。在阅片者对DSA中狭窄程度达成一致的病例中,分析了狭窄分级的模态间变异性。DSA在狭窄分级方面存在显著的观察者间变异性(平均kappa值为0.64)。3D-Gd-MRA显示观察者间变异性略有改善,但在两点量表(<50%,≥50%)上对34条狭窄中的6条分级错误。3D-Gd-MRA和PC-flow的联合方法显示出最佳的(P = 0.0003)观察者间变异性(中位数kappa = 0.75),并且与DSA几乎具有完美的模态间一致性(97%的病例)。这些发现在前瞻性分析97条肾动脉中得到了证实。肾动脉开口处的血管可视性在3D-Gd-MRA中明显优于DSA,而肾门和肾内血管的可视性则明显更差(P = 0.0001)。形态学和功能磁共振联合检查显著降低了观察者间变异性,并基于狭窄形态和血流动力学变化提供了可靠且可重复的肾动脉狭窄分级。在不需要评估肾内血管的情况下,它可被视为诊断DSA的安全且无创的替代方法。