Caron O, Gelat T, Rougier P, Blanchi J P
UFR Staps, Laboratoire ESP, Universite de Toulon et du Var, Lagarde Cedex, France.
J Appl Biomech. 2000 Aug;16(3):234-47. doi: 10.1123/jab.16.3.234.
The center of foot pressure (CP) motions, representing the net neuromuscular control, was compared to the center of gravity (CG) motions, representing the net performance. The comparison focused on the trajectory path length parameter along the medio-lateral and antero-posterior axes because these two variables depend on amplitude versus frequency relationship. This relationship was used to evaluate the CG motions based on the CP motions. Seven subjects stood still on a force plate with eyes open and eyes closed. The results showed that the ratio of (CP-CG)/CP trajectory path length was personal for each subject. These results suggest different levels of passive (ligaments, elastic properties) and active (reflex activity) stiffness. For some subjects, this ratio was significantly lower for the eyes open condition than for the eyes closed condition, indicating a decrease of the active stiffness for the eyes open condition. Therefore, a CG-CP comparative analysis appeared helpful in understanding the control of balance and necessary to quantify the subjects' net performance.
将代表神经肌肉净控制的足底压力中心(CP)运动与代表净表现的重心(CG)运动进行了比较。比较集中在沿内外侧和前后轴的轨迹路径长度参数上,因为这两个变量取决于幅度与频率的关系。这种关系被用于基于CP运动来评估CG运动。七名受试者分别在睁眼和闭眼状态下站在测力板上。结果表明,(CP-CG)/CP轨迹路径长度的比值因受试者而异。这些结果表明了被动(韧带、弹性特性)和主动(反射活动)刚度的不同水平。对于一些受试者,睁眼状态下该比值显著低于闭眼状态,表明睁眼状态下主动刚度降低。因此,CG-CP对比分析似乎有助于理解平衡控制,并且对于量化受试者的净表现是必要的。