Suppr超能文献

世界各地用于控制气味的不同方法的比较。

Comparison of different approaches used to regulate odours around the world.

作者信息

Mahin T D

机构信息

Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, 205a Lowell St., Wilmington, MA 01887, USA.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2001;44(9):87-102.

Abstract

A number of different countries, and states and local regulatory agencies within countries, have struggled with developing effective odour regulations or guidelines. The challenge is to develop regulations or guidelines that both avoid odour annoyance conditions and are not excessively conservative. This paper will present highlights of odour regulations or guidelines in Europe, Asia, Australia, New Zealand and North America. A comparison between the different approaches will be presented. With a number of countries reporting an increase in complaints due to odours, the field of odour assessment is rapidly evolving. Complaints due to odours from livestock facilities are also significantly increasing in many countries. A comparison of approaches used to regulate livestock operations is also included in the paper. The potential impact of European olfactometry standardisation efforts to existing assumptions about odour annoyance or nuisance levels is analysed.

摘要

许多不同的国家以及这些国家内的州和地方监管机构,都在努力制定有效的气味法规或指南。面临的挑战是制定既能避免气味扰民情况又不过于保守的法规或指南。本文将介绍欧洲、亚洲、澳大利亚、新西兰和北美的气味法规或指南要点。还将对不同方法进行比较。随着许多国家报告因气味产生的投诉增加,气味评估领域正在迅速发展。在许多国家,来自畜牧设施的气味投诉也在显著增加。本文还包括对用于规范畜牧场运营的方法的比较。分析了欧洲嗅觉测定标准化工作对现有关于气味扰民或滋扰水平假设的潜在影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验