Kawase T, Okuda K, Momose M, Kato Y, Yoshie H, Burns D M
Department of Pharmacology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan.
J Periodontal Res. 2001 Dec;36(6):367-76. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0765.2001.360604.x.
In our previous study, we demonstrated that porcine enamel matrix derivative (EMD) induces p21WAF1/cip1 within 8 hours and subsequently arrests the cell cycle of human oral epithelial cells in G1 phase. In contrast, EMD markedly stimulates the proliferation of gingival fibroblasts without inducing p21WAF1/cip1. To investigate the mechanism of how EMD produces these differential effects, we have focused on the initial response of these two cell types to EMD. In epithelial cell cultures, EMD stimulated cytoskeletal actin polymerization within 30 min and promoted cell adhesion in our experimental system. EMD failed to stimulate either intracellular Ca2+ mobilization or cAMP production in either cell type. In both epithelial and fibroblastic cells, EMD (25-100 microgram/ml) rapidly produced dose-dependent phosphorylation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family: extracellular signal response kinase (ERK), p38-MAPK (p38-K), and c-Jun-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase (JNK). However, neither inhibitors of MEK (ERK kinase) nor p38-K could block EMD's anti-proliferative action on epithelial cells. On the other hand, EMD rapidly stimulated translocation of smad2 into the nucleus in both cell types. Spurred by this finding, we assayed for TGF-beta1, a ligand for one receptor associated with smad2 activation, and detected significant levels in EMD preparations. The sum of these pharmacological findings indicates that EMD contains at least one bioactive factor, which is most probably TGF-beta1 (or TGF-beta-like substances). In conjunction with the similarities in the differential growth-modulating actions between EMD and what is known for TGF-beta, we suggest that TGF-beta might act as the principal growth regulating agent of oral fibroblastic and epithelial cell types in EMD despite being present in only low levels.
在我们之前的研究中,我们证明猪牙釉质基质衍生物(EMD)在8小时内诱导p21WAF1/cip1,随后使人口腔上皮细胞的细胞周期停滞在G1期。相比之下,EMD显著刺激牙龈成纤维细胞的增殖,而不诱导p21WAF1/cip1。为了研究EMD产生这些不同作用的机制,我们聚焦于这两种细胞类型对EMD的初始反应。在上皮细胞培养中,EMD在30分钟内刺激细胞骨架肌动蛋白聚合,并在我们的实验系统中促进细胞黏附。EMD未能刺激任何一种细胞类型的细胞内Ca2+动员或cAMP产生。在上皮细胞和成纤维细胞中,EMD(25 - 100微克/毫升)迅速产生剂量依赖性的丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)家族磷酸化:细胞外信号调节激酶(ERK)、p38 - MAPK(p38 - K)和c - Jun末端激酶/应激激活蛋白激酶(JNK)。然而,MEK(ERK激酶)抑制剂和p38 - K均不能阻断EMD对上皮细胞的抗增殖作用。另一方面,EMD在两种细胞类型中均迅速刺激smad2易位至细胞核。受这一发现的启发,我们检测了TGF - β1(一种与smad2激活相关的受体的配体),并在EMD制剂中检测到显著水平。这些药理学研究结果表明,EMD含有至少一种生物活性因子,极有可能是TGF - β1(或TGF - β样物质)。结合EMD与已知的TGF - β在不同生长调节作用方面的相似性,我们认为TGF - β可能是EMD中调节口腔成纤维细胞和上皮细胞类型生长的主要因子,尽管其含量很低。