John T J
Kerala State Institute of Virology and Infectious Diseases, Alapuzha, India.
Dev Biol (Basel). 2001;105:197-208.
Anomalies of vaccine performance are events or observations that go counter to the current paradigms on the properties of a vaccine. In the current paradigm, inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) induces serum immunity to protect the individual from poliomyelitis, but not mucosal immunity to prevent subsequent wild poliovirus infection. Therefore, it is believed not to be suitable to interrupt virus transmission in polio-endemic tropical and developing countries, where poliovirus transmission is thought to be predominantly faecal-oral, unlike in countries with excellent sanitation, where it is predominantly respiratory. Oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV), because it is believed to mimic natural (wild) poliovirus infection and to induce serum and mucosal immunity, is considered ideal to interrupt virus transmission in countries with poor sanitation and endemic polio. Moreover, the vaccine viruses are shed in the stools and it is presumed to spread faeco-orally to unvaccinated children in the vicinity, thus increasing its effectiveness in the community. These paradigms on both vaccines may be seen in standard textbooks of virology and paediatrics. In reality, IPV induces very high mucosal immunity in a monkey model, lasting at least 12 months and providing complete protection against oral challenge with wild virus. In field trials, IPV has been found to have very high vaccine efficacy (VE) and to retard significantly wild-virus transmission in communities. OPV, requiring five to seven doses for individual protection, does not seem to induce effective mucosal immunity. Hence, 10-15 doses of OPV and near 100% vaccination coverage are necessary for interruption of virus transmission in countries with poor sanitation. In the monkey model, wild poliovirus infection did not offer any mucosal protection against a second infection, indicating that live virus infection is not the best way to induce mucosal immunity (unless repeated several times). The immunity induced by OPV has two arms, individual protection (by serum immunity) and mucosal protection from later infection by wild virus; these are dichotomous, as evidenced further by protected children participating in wild virus transmission in breakthrough outbreaks in communities well vaccinated with OPV. There is no evidence that polioviruses, wild or vaccine, spread faeco-orally to any meaningful extent. The median age of polio in India, in the pre-vaccine era, and even in recent years was 12-18 months. No other faeco-oral infection has such a low median age. Measles virus transmission is respiratory, and the median age of measles is over two years. Wild virus is shed faecally, but by the age when faecal microbes infect children, most of them are already immune to disease caused by polioviruses. As for vaccine viruses, even when heavy inocula are fed repeatedly, children may not always become infected. That exposure to the small amounts of virus through faecal contamination (unlike microbes that multiply in food) would infect them, is an unrealistic expectation. There are sufficient anomalies demanding our revision of the old paradigms. IPV is a better immunogen than OPV and is completely safe. During the interval between the cessation of wild virus transmission and the global stoppage of polio vaccination, it will be advantageous to use IPV, particularly combined with DPT vaccine, to provide individual protection, and herd effect to prevent spread in case of the introduction of wild polioviruses, whether unintentionally or otherwise, and to bolster the Expanded Programme on Immunisation.
疫苗性能异常是指与当前关于疫苗特性的范式相悖的事件或观察结果。在当前范式中,灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(IPV)诱导血清免疫以保护个体免受脊髓灰质炎侵害,但不诱导黏膜免疫以预防随后的野生脊髓灰质炎病毒感染。因此,人们认为它不适用于在脊髓灰质炎流行的热带和发展中国家阻断病毒传播,在这些国家,脊髓灰质炎病毒传播被认为主要是粪口途径,这与卫生条件良好的国家不同,在那些国家主要是呼吸道传播途径。口服脊髓灰质炎病毒疫苗(OPV),因为人们认为它模拟自然(野生)脊髓灰质炎病毒感染并诱导血清和黏膜免疫,所以被认为是在卫生条件差且脊髓灰质炎流行的国家阻断病毒传播的理想选择。此外,疫苗病毒从粪便中排出,推测会通过粪口途径传播给附近未接种疫苗的儿童,从而提高其在社区中的有效性。关于这两种疫苗的这些范式可以在病毒学和儿科学的标准教科书中看到。实际上,IPV在猴子模型中诱导非常高的黏膜免疫,持续至少12个月,并对野生病毒的口服攻击提供完全保护。在现场试验中,已发现IPV具有非常高的疫苗效力(VE),并能显著延缓社区中野生病毒的传播。OPV需要五到七剂才能提供个体保护,似乎不会诱导有效的黏膜免疫。因此,在卫生条件差的国家,需要10 - 15剂OPV且接近100%的疫苗接种覆盖率才能阻断病毒传播。在猴子模型中,野生脊髓灰质炎病毒感染并未对二次感染提供任何黏膜保护,这表明活病毒感染不是诱导黏膜免疫的最佳方式(除非重复多次)。OPV诱导的免疫有两个方面,个体保护(通过血清免疫)和防止野生病毒后续感染的黏膜保护;这两者是二分的,在接种OPV的社区中发生突破性疫情时,受保护的儿童参与野生病毒传播进一步证明了这一点。没有证据表明脊髓灰质炎病毒,无论是野生的还是疫苗株,会在任何有意义的程度上通过粪口途径传播。在印度,在疫苗接种前的时代,甚至在近年来,脊髓灰质炎的中位发病年龄是12 - 18个月。没有其他粪口途径感染的中位发病年龄如此之低。麻疹病毒传播是通过呼吸道,麻疹的中位发病年龄超过两岁。野生病毒通过粪便排出,但到粪便中的微生物感染儿童的年龄时,他们中的大多数已经对脊髓灰质炎病毒引起的疾病具有免疫力。至于疫苗病毒,即使反复投喂大量病毒,儿童也不一定总会被感染。期望通过粪便污染接触少量病毒(与在食物中繁殖的微生物不同)就能感染他们,这是不现实的。有足够多的异常情况要求我们修正旧的范式。IPV是比OPV更好的数据免疫原,并且完全安全。在野生病毒传播停止到全球停止脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种的间隔期间,使用IPV将是有利的,特别是与白百破疫苗联合使用,以提供个体保护,并产生群体效应,以防止野生脊髓灰质炎病毒无论无意还是其他方式传入时的传播,并加强扩大免疫规划。