White P F, Watcha M F
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas South-Western Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9068, USA.
Eur J Anaesthesiol Suppl. 2001;23:10-5.
Newer anaesthetic agents provide a faster onset, easier titration and a more rapid recovery than the older agents, but are more expensive. In assessing the financial consequences associated with their use, it is important to examine the total costs (including personnel costs) and not just the acquisition costs of new drugs. Claims of cost savings from new drugs should be subjected to close scrutiny, with studies designed to demonstrate that the preferential use of the newer drug is associated with actual decreased payments for personnel, an earlier return to normal activities by the patient and/or their caretakers, or the completion of an additional case in the same operating session. It may be necessary to alter work patterns to obtain the full benefits of the new drugs (e.g. bypass of the labour-intensive [phase I] postanaesthetic care unit). Finally, greater cost savings in the operating room can be achieved by increasing efficiency in resource utilization. A delay in starting a case, or a prolonged turnover time between cases, can negate any cost savings related to the anaesthetist's choice of drugs.
新型麻醉剂比旧型麻醉剂起效更快、滴定更易、恢复更快,但价格更贵。在评估使用它们所带来的财务影响时,重要的是要考察总成本(包括人员成本),而不仅仅是新药的购置成本。关于新药节省成本的说法应受到严格审查,相关研究应旨在证明优先使用新药与人员实际支出减少、患者及其护理人员更早恢复正常活动和/或在同一手术时段完成额外一台手术相关。可能有必要改变工作模式以充分利用新药(例如绕过劳动密集型的[第一阶段]麻醉后护理单元)。最后,通过提高资源利用效率可在手术室实现更大的成本节省。病例开始延迟或病例之间周转时间延长,可能会抵消与麻醉师药物选择相关的任何成本节省。