Veach P M, Bartels D M, LeRoy B S
Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
J Genet Couns. 2001 Apr;10(2):97-119. doi: 10.1023/a:1009487513618.
Ninety-seven physicians, nurses, and genetic counselors from four regions within the United States participated in focus groups to identify the types of ethical and professional challenges that arise when their patients have genetic concerns. Responses were taped and transcribed and then analyzed using the Hill et al. (1997, Counsel Psychol 25:517-522) Consensual Qualitative Research method of analysis. Sixteen major ethical and professional domains and 63 subcategories were identified. Major domains are informed consent; withholding information; facing uncertainty; resource allocation; value conflicts, directiveness/nondirectiveness; determining the primary patient; professional identity issues; emotional responses; diversity issues; confidentiality; attaining/maintaining proficiency; professional misconduct; discrimination; colleague error; and documentation. Implications for practitioners who deal with genetic issues and recommendations for additional research are given.
来自美国四个地区的97名医生、护士和遗传咨询师参与了焦点小组,以确定当他们的患者存在基因相关问题时出现的伦理和专业挑战类型。对回复进行了录音和转录,然后使用希尔等人(1997年,《咨询心理学》25:517 - 522)的共识定性研究分析方法进行分析。确定了16个主要伦理和专业领域以及63个子类别。主要领域包括知情同意;信息隐瞒;面对不确定性;资源分配;价值冲突、指导性/非指导性;确定主要患者;职业身份问题;情绪反应;多样性问题;保密;获得/保持专业能力;职业不当行为;歧视;同事失误;以及记录。文中给出了对处理基因问题的从业者的启示以及进一步研究的建议。