Detterman D K
J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1975 Sep;1(5):614-28.
When an outstanding item appears in an otherwise homogeneous list of items, the outstanding item is better remembered (the von Restorff effect), and items before and after it may be more poorly remembered (induced amnesia) than corresponding items in a control list. In the present experiments the outstanding item was a word presented as a loud shout among other words presented at normal conversational levels. In two experiments, large retrograde- and anterograde-induced amnesiae effects were demonstrated using a free-recall and a recognition task. In both experiments half of the subjects were told what to expect and were instructed to devise a strategy to eliminate induced amnesia. These instructions failed to eliminate the amnesiac effect. A third experiment was designed to demonstrate an empirical similarity between induced and clinical amnesia. In clinical retrograde (but not anterograde) amnesia, "lost" memories are sometimes recovered with time. Filled delays of 0, 30, or 120 sec interpolated between list presentation and recall demonstrated that induced retrograde amnesia disappeared at the longest delay but induced anterograde amnesia was unchanged. A fourth experiment eliminated some alternate interpretations of the effect.
当一个突出的项目出现在其他方面均一的项目列表中时,该突出项目会被更好地记住(冯·雷斯托夫效应),并且它之前和之后的项目可能比对照列表中的相应项目更难被记住(诱发遗忘)。在本实验中,突出项目是一个以大声呼喊呈现的单词,而其他单词则以正常对话水平呈现。在两个实验中,使用自由回忆和识别任务证明了大的逆行性和顺行性诱发遗忘效应。在两个实验中,一半的受试者被告知预期情况,并被指示设计一种策略来消除诱发遗忘。这些指示未能消除遗忘效应。第三个实验旨在证明诱发遗忘和临床遗忘之间的经验相似性。在临床逆行性(而非顺行性)遗忘中,“丢失”的记忆有时会随着时间的推移而恢复。在列表呈现和回忆之间插入0、30或120秒的填充延迟表明,诱发的逆行性遗忘在最长延迟时消失,但诱发的顺行性遗忘没有变化。第四个实验排除了对该效应的一些其他解释。