• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单次穿刺:一种扩张经皮肾镜取石术肾造瘘通道的新方法。

One shot: a novel method to dilate the nephrostomy access for percutaneous lithotripsy.

作者信息

Frattini A, Barbieri A, Salsi P, Sebastio N, Ferretti S, Bergamaschi E, Cortellini P

机构信息

Division of Urology, Hospital of Parma, Italy.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2001 Nov;15(9):919-23. doi: 10.1089/089277901753284143.

DOI:10.1089/089277901753284143
PMID:11769847
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The creation of the nephrostomy access is a fundamental step of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL). Dilation of the track is usually achieved with multiple incremental flexible exchange dilators of the Amplatz type, metal telescoping dilators of the Alken type, or a balloon. Currently, balloon dilation is regarded as the most modern and safest system, though it has the disadvantage of relatively high cost. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that a procedure that we named "one shot," which consists of a single dilation of the track with a 25F or 30F Amplatz dilator, compares favorably in terms of efficacy, costs, and length with the other techniques of track dilation, without a significant increase in morbidity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent PCNL for stone disease from June 1998 to July 1999 were considered and divided into three groups according to the type of tract dilation used: A (Alken telescoping dilators), B (balloon), or C (one shot). Radiologic exposure, blood loss, and costs were evaluated.

RESULTS

The one-shot procedure compared favorably with both of the other dilation techniques without an increase in morbidity and with significant reductions in X-ray exposure and costs. Indeed, significant differences in estimated blood loss were observed between groups B and C and the minor bleeding for group C.

CONCLUSION

Our experience indicates that one-shot dilation is feasible in the majority of patients. It is as safe and effective as the technique regarded today as the gold standard but less time consuming and less expensive. These encouraging results should be confirmed by further studies.

摘要

背景与目的

建立肾造瘘通道是经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)的基本步骤。通道扩张通常使用多种递增式的安普拉斯(Amplatz)型柔性交换扩张器、阿尔肯(Alken)型金属伸缩扩张器或球囊来完成。目前,球囊扩张被认为是最现代且最安全的系统,尽管其缺点是成本相对较高。本研究的目的是证明一种我们称为“单次扩张”的方法,即使用25F或30F安普拉斯扩张器对通道进行单次扩张,在疗效、成本和操作时长方面与其他通道扩张技术相比具有优势,且不会显著增加并发症发生率。

患者与方法

纳入1998年6月至1999年7月期间连续78例因结石疾病接受PCNL的患者,并根据所使用的通道扩张类型分为三组:A组(阿尔肯伸缩扩张器)、B组(球囊)或C组(单次扩张)。评估了放射学暴露、失血量和成本。

结果

单次扩张方法与其他两种扩张技术相比具有优势,并发症发生率未增加,且X线暴露和成本显著降低。事实上,B组和C组之间在估计失血量上存在显著差异,C组有少量出血。

结论

我们研究显示单次扩张在大多数患者中是可行的。它与当今被视为金标准的技术一样安全有效,但耗时更短且成本更低。这些令人鼓舞的结果应通过进一步研究加以证实。

相似文献

1
One shot: a novel method to dilate the nephrostomy access for percutaneous lithotripsy.单次穿刺:一种扩张经皮肾镜取石术肾造瘘通道的新方法。
J Endourol. 2001 Nov;15(9):919-23. doi: 10.1089/089277901753284143.
2
One-shot versus metal telescopic dilation technique for tract creation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: comparison of safety and efficacy.经皮肾镜取石术中用于建立通道的单次扩张与金属伸缩式扩张技术:安全性和有效性的比较
J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):615-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0330.
3
A comparison of metal telescopic dilators and Amplatz dilators for nephrostomy tract dilation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜碎石取石术中金属伸缩扩张器与 Amplatz 扩张器扩张经皮肾造瘘通道的比较。
J Endourol. 2012 Jun;26(6):630-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0291. Epub 2011 Oct 14.
4
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with previous open nephrolithotomy: one-shot versus telescopic technique for tract dilatation.既往接受过开放性肾结石手术患者的经皮肾镜取石术:一步扩张法与套叠扩张法治疗通道扩张的比较
J Endourol. 2008 Mar;22(3):423-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0206.
5
A prospective randomized study comparing the four tract dilation methods of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.一项比较经皮肾镜取石术四种通道扩张方法的前瞻性随机研究。
World J Urol. 2017 May;35(5):803-807. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1929-9. Epub 2016 Sep 10.
6
One-Shot Dilatation Metal Dilator During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Flank-Free Supine Position: A Randomized Controlled Study.单次扩张法在侧卧位无俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术中应用金属扩张器:一项随机对照研究。
J Endourol. 2022 Jun;36(6):727-733. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0378.
7
One-stage tract dilation for percutaneous nephrolithotomy: is it justified?经皮肾镜取石术的一期通道扩张:是否合理?
J Endourol. 2007 Dec;21(12):1415-20. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.0454.
8
Randomized and prospective trial comparing tract creation using plasma vaporization with balloon dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.随机前瞻性试验比较经皮肾镜取石术中等离子汽化与球囊扩张建立通道的效果。
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(1):89-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11507.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
9
Balloon dilation versus Amplatz dilation during ultrasound-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn stones.鹿角形结石超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中球囊扩张与安普拉斯扩张的比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(6):1057-61.
10
A comparison of Amplatz dilators and metal dilators for tract dilatation in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.迷你经皮肾镜取石术中使用安普拉斯扩张器和金属扩张器进行通道扩张的比较。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2017 Apr;49(4):581-585. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1516-z. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Simultaneous single-tract bilateral percutaneous nephrolithotomy in bilateral large complex renal stones is not associated with increased complications: series of 36 consecutive patients.双侧巨大复杂性肾结石同期单通道双侧经皮肾镜取石术与并发症增加无关:36例连续病例系列研究
BMC Urol. 2025 May 24;25(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12894-025-01821-8.
2
Transient ureteral obstruction after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with stone volume and location: results from a single-center, real-life study.经皮肾镜碎石术后短暂性输尿管梗阻与结石体积和位置有关:一项单中心真实世界研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 13;42(1):146. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04832-6.
3
Micro cost-effectiveness analysis of standard vs. mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy A single Canadian institution's experience.
标准经皮肾镜取石术与迷你经皮肾镜取石术的微观成本效益分析:一家加拿大机构的经验
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Jun;18(6):169-178. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8679.
4
Comparing Balloon Dilation to Non-Balloon Dilation for Access in Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.比较超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中球囊扩张与非球囊扩张的通道建立:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2024 Jan-Feb;50(1):7-19. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2023.0373.
5
What is the safe and effective dilator number during access in PCNL? Three-shot dilation versus classical sequential Amplatz dilation.经皮肾镜取石术中安全有效的扩张器数量是多少?三枪扩张与经典序贯 Amplatz 扩张比较。
BMC Urol. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01368-6.
6
Endoscopic dilation using two guidewires: a novel approach for establishing access tract during percutaneous nephrolithotomy under ultrasonographic guidance.超声引导经皮肾镜取石术中使用两根导丝进行内镜扩张:一种建立通道的新方法。
J Int Med Res. 2023 Nov;51(11):3000605231213228. doi: 10.1177/03000605231213228.
7
The effect of percutaneous tract dilation technique on renal parenchymal trauma: An experimental study on a porcine model.经皮通道扩张技术对肾实质创伤的影响:一项在猪模型上的实验研究。
Urol Ann. 2023 Apr-Jun;15(2):191-196. doi: 10.4103/ua.ua_25_22. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
8
Comparison of safety and efficacy of one shot dilation vs. gradual dilation technique in supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy.仰卧位经皮肾镜取石术中单次扩张与逐渐扩张技术的安全性和疗效比较。
World J Urol. 2023 Jun;41(6):1659-1666. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04393-0. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
9
Feasibility of one-shot dilation access in the pediatric age group.小儿年龄组单次扩张通路的可行性。
World J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Jan 6;5(1):e000311. doi: 10.1136/wjps-2021-000311. eCollection 2022.
10
The feasibility and safety of one-shot dilatation compared to conventional sequential dilatation in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.经皮肾镜碎石取石术中单次扩张与传统序贯扩张的可行性和安全性比较:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec 1;51(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01383-6.