Suppr超能文献

单次扩张法在侧卧位无俯卧位经皮肾镜取石术中应用金属扩张器:一项随机对照研究。

One-Shot Dilatation Metal Dilator During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Flank-Free Supine Position: A Randomized Controlled Study.

机构信息

Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Fayoum University, Fayoum, Egypt.

Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2022 Jun;36(6):727-733. doi: 10.1089/end.2021.0378.

Abstract

The creation and dilatation of the nephrostomy tract is a fundamental step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). In one-shot dilatation (OSD), we used a single Amplatz dilator over a central Alken rod. PCNL in the supine position is as effective and safe as in the prone position. The Barts flank-free modified supine position sums several advantages of the different supine positions. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of OSD compared with metal telescopic dilator (MTD) during PCNL while the patient was in Barts flank-free modified supine position. Within 2.5 years, 150 patients with kidney stone candidates for PCNL were randomized into two equal groups according to the dilatation technique. In the OSD group, dilatation was performed using a single Amplatz dilator (30F) and in the MTD group dilatation was performed by sequential MTD (9-30F). All PCNL procedures were done with patients in Barts flank-free modified supine position. Patient characteristics, operative data, and results were collected for statistical analysis. There are no statistically significant differences between both groups regarding patients' characters. The tracts were effectively dilated in all patients. Statistical analyses show a significant difference ( ˂ 0.05) between both groups regarding the time of dilatation (seconds; 68 ± 15 147 ± 18), time of X-ray exposure (seconds; during dilatation; 36 ± 10 61 ± 15 and the total; 157 ± 16 181 ± 20), hemoglobin loss (mg/dL; 0.7 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.3), and hospital stay (days; 3 ± 0.6 3.7 ± 0.7) with favorable results to OSD. Complication rates were comparable between the two groups. OSD is efficient as MTD during PCNL while patients are in Barts flank-free modified supine position, with less dilatation time, X-ray exposure, blood loss, and hospital stay than MTD.

摘要

经皮肾镜碎石取石术(PCNL)的基本步骤是建立和扩张经皮肾造瘘通道。在单次扩张(OSD)中,我们使用单一的 Amplatz 扩张器和中央 Alken 杆。仰卧位 PCNL 与俯卧位 PCNL 同样有效且安全。Barts 无侧卧位改良仰卧位结合了不同仰卧位的优点。我们评估了 OSD 与金属伸缩扩张器(MTD)在 Barts 无侧卧位改良仰卧位下进行 PCNL 时的疗效和安全性。在 2.5 年内,根据扩张技术将 150 名肾结石候选 PCNL 患者随机分为两组。在 OSD 组,使用单一的 Amplatz 扩张器(30F)进行扩张,在 MTD 组,通过顺序 MTD(9-30F)进行扩张。所有 PCNL 手术均在 Barts 无侧卧位改良仰卧位下进行。收集患者特征、手术数据和结果进行统计分析。两组患者的特征无统计学差异。所有患者的通道均得到有效扩张。统计分析显示,两组之间在扩张时间(秒;68±15 147±18)、X 射线曝光时间(秒;扩张期间;36±10 61±15 和总;157±16 181±18)、血红蛋白丢失(mg/dL;0.7±0.2 1.2±0.3)和住院时间(天;3±0.6 3.7±0.7)方面存在显著差异( ˂ 0.05),OSD 效果较好。两组并发症发生率相当。在 Barts 无侧卧位改良仰卧位下,OSD 与 MTD 相比,PCNL 时扩张时间、X 射线曝光时间、失血量和住院时间更少,效果相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验