• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者及旁观者对医疗紧急情况的反应。

Patient and bystander response to medical emergencies.

作者信息

Mogielnicki R P, Stevenson K A, Willemain T R

出版信息

Med Care. 1975 Sep;13(9):753-62. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197509000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-197509000-00005
PMID:1177540
Abstract

This study of patient and bystander responses to medical emergencies revealed serious shortcomings in the public's ability to respond appropriately to such situations. Decision delays at least as long as ambulance response delays were found to be the result of confusion regarding the seriousness of the emergency, confusion regarding the appropriate reaction to the emergency, and a reluctance to burden the rescue service unnecessarily. A significant group of high-risk patients were identified who not only reacted slowly but who bypassed the emergency ambulance service entirely. A substantial fraction of these patients have had prior contact with the local medical care system for problems related or identical to the one causing the emergency.

摘要

这项关于患者及旁观者对医疗紧急情况反应的研究揭示了公众在应对此类情况时能力上的严重缺陷。发现决策延迟至少与救护车响应延迟一样长,其原因包括对紧急情况严重性的困惑、对紧急情况适当反应的困惑以及不愿给救援服务带来不必要的负担。确定了一大批高危患者,他们不仅反应迟缓,而且完全绕过了紧急救护车服务。这些患者中有很大一部分之前因与导致紧急情况相关或相同的问题与当地医疗系统有过接触。

相似文献

1
Patient and bystander response to medical emergencies.患者及旁观者对医疗紧急情况的反应。
Med Care. 1975 Sep;13(9):753-62. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197509000-00005.
2
Ambulance alerting of paediatric emergencies to a general hospital.向综合医院发出儿科急诊救护车警报。
Resuscitation. 2004 Dec;63(3):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.06.001.
3
Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients.“非重症”紧急救护服务患者电话咨询的安全性
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):363-73. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.363.
4
[The importance of access-to-patient-period in the emergency service].[急诊服务中接触患者时间段的重要性]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2001 Dec;36(12):742-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-18986.
5
Epidemiology of ambulance utilized patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴救护车使用患者的流行病学情况。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):997. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3820-4.
6
The association between ambulance hospital turnaround times and patient acuity, destination hospital, and time of day.救护车医院周转时间与患者病情、目的地医院和一天中的时间之间的关联。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):366-70. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.561412. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
7
Observational study of prehospital delays in patients with chest pain.胸痛患者院前延误的观察性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2003 May;20(3):270-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.20.3.270.
8
Family & bystander experiences of emergency ambulance services care: a scoping review.家庭和旁观者对紧急救护服务护理的体验:范围综述。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 14;23(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00829-3.
9
Impact of an emergency department closure on the local emergency medical services system.急诊科关闭对当地紧急医疗服务系统的影响。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):198-203. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.640418. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
10
Patient and case characteristics associated with 'no paramedic treatment' for low-acuity cases referred for emergency ambulance dispatch following a secondary telephone triage: a retrospective cohort study.患者和病例特征与二次电话分诊后因低危病例转急诊救护车派遣而“无急救人员治疗”相关:一项回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 10;26(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0475-4.

引用本文的文献

1
A review and critique of academic lab safety research.学术实验室安全研究的回顾与批判。
Nat Chem. 2020 Jan;12(1):17-25. doi: 10.1038/s41557-019-0375-x. Epub 2019 Nov 18.