Wachter Stefan, Gerstner Natascha, Dorner Daniela, Goldner Gregor, Colotto Adriana, Wambersie Andre, Pötter Richard
Department of Radiotherapy and Radiobiology, Vienna General Hospital, University of Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jan 1;52(1):91-100. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(01)01821-1.
A prospective comparative study of a subset of 10 consecutive patients was performed, to describe the effects of an air-inflated rectal balloon tube that has been used for prostate immobilization in 360 patients since 1994. In particular, influences on prostate motion, rectum filling variations, and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the rectum during a course of conformal radiotherapy were investigated.
Computed tomographic (CT) examinations without and with rectal balloon (filled with 40 mL air) were performed at the start (t(0)), middle (t(mi)), and end of treatment (t(e)), resulting in 6 CT scans for each patient. Prostate displacement was measured from a lateral beam's-eye-view. DVHs of rectum as a solid organ, and anterior, posterior, and whole rectum wall were calculated at t(0), t(mi), and t(e), and variations during treatment were analyzed for both examinations, with and without balloon.
By use of the balloon, rectum filling variations (p = 0.04) and maximum anterior-posterior displacements of the prostate (p = 0.008) were reduced significantly, leading to a reduction in DVH variations during treatment. Maximum displacements of posterior prostate border (>5 mm) were found in 8/10 patients without a rectum balloon and in only 2/10 patients with the balloon. The balloon led to a significant reduction in partial posterior rectal wall volumes included in the high-dose regions, without significant changes at the anterior rectum wall in cases of irradiation of the prostate only. However, when entirely irradiating the whole seminal vesicles, this advantage was lost.
The rectal balloon catheter represents a simple technique to immobilize the prostate and to determine the position of the anterior rectal wall at daily treatment. This allows a reduction of margins, because of reduced prostate movement during treatment course.
对连续10例患者进行前瞻性对比研究,以描述自1994年以来已用于360例患者前列腺固定的充气直肠球囊管的效果。特别研究了在适形放疗过程中对前列腺运动、直肠充盈变化以及直肠剂量体积直方图(DVH)的影响。
在治疗开始时(t(0))、中期(t(mi))和结束时(t(e))分别进行有无直肠球囊(充入40 mL空气)的计算机断层扫描(CT)检查,每位患者共获得6次CT扫描。从侧位束流视野测量前列腺位移。在t(0)、t(mi)和t(e)计算直肠作为实体器官以及直肠前壁、后壁和整个直肠壁的DVH,并分析有球囊和无球囊两种检查在治疗期间的变化。
使用球囊后,直肠充盈变化(p = 0.04)和前列腺最大前后位移(p = 0.008)显著降低,导致治疗期间DVH变化减小。在10例无直肠球囊的患者中有8例发现前列腺后缘最大位移>5 mm,而有球囊的患者中仅2例。球囊使高剂量区域内包含的部分直肠后壁体积显著减少,仅照射前列腺时直肠前壁无显著变化。然而,当完全照射整个精囊时,这一优势丧失。
直肠球囊导管是一种在日常治疗中固定前列腺并确定直肠前壁位置的简单技术。由于在治疗过程中前列腺运动减少,这使得边界得以缩小。