Suppr超能文献

局限性前列腺癌的放射治疗:对 1293 例患者行近距离放疗和外照射放疗后肿瘤控制和晚期毒性的多中心分析。

Radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer: a multicenter analysis evaluating tumor control and late toxicity after brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in 1293 patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Strahlenther Onkol. 2024 Aug;200(8):698-705. doi: 10.1007/s00066-024-02222-w. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Comparing oncological outcomes and toxicity after primary treatment of localized prostate cancer using HDR- or LDR-mono-brachytherapy (BT), or conventionally (CF) or moderately hypofractionated (HF) external beam radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospectively, patients with low- (LR) or favorable intermediate-risk (IR) prostate cancer treated between 03/2000 and 09/2022 in two centers were included. Treatment was performed using either CF with total doses between 74 and 78 Gy, HF with 2.4-2.6 Gy per fraction in 30 fractions, or LDR- or HDR-BT. Biochemical control (BC) according to the Phoenix criteria, and late gastrointestinal (GI), and genitourinary (GU) toxicity according to RTOG/EORTC criteria were assessed.

RESULTS

We identified 1293 patients, 697 with LR and 596 with IR prostate cancer. Of these, 470, 182, 480, and 161 were treated with CF, HF, LDR-BT, and HDR-BT, respectively. For BC, we did not find a significant difference between treatments in LR and IR (p = 0.31 and 0.72). The 5‑year BC for LR was between 93 and 95% for all treatment types. For IR, BC was between 88% in the CF and 94% in the HF group. For CF and HF, maximum GI and GU toxicity grade ≥ 2 was between 22 and 27%. For LDR-BT, we observed 67% grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity. Maximum GI grade ≥ 2 toxicity was 9%. For HDR-BT, we observed 1% GI grade ≥ 2 toxicity and 19% GU grade ≥ 2 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

All types of therapy were effective and well received. HDR-BT caused the least late toxicities, especially GI.

摘要

背景与目的

比较使用 HDR 或 LDR 单式近距离放疗(BT)、常规(CF)或中度超分割放疗(HF)对局限性前列腺癌进行初始治疗后的肿瘤学结果和毒性。

材料与方法

回顾性纳入 2000 年 3 月至 2022 年 9 月在两个中心治疗的低危(LR)或中危(IR)局限性前列腺癌患者。治疗方法包括 CF,总剂量为 74-78 Gy;HF,30 次分割,每次 2.4-2.6 Gy;LDR 或 HDR-BT。根据凤凰标准评估生化控制(BC),根据 RTOG/EORTC 标准评估晚期胃肠道(GI)和泌尿生殖系统(GU)毒性。

结果

共纳入 1293 例患者,LR 前列腺癌 697 例,IR 前列腺癌 596 例。其中 CF、HF、LDR-BT 和 HDR-BT 治疗分别为 470、182、480 和 161 例。LR 和 IR 患者的 BC 治疗之间无显著差异(p=0.31 和 0.72)。LR 患者的 5 年 BC 为所有治疗类型的 93%-95%。IR 患者中,CF 组和 HF 组的 BC 分别为 88%和 94%。CF 和 HF 的最大 GI 和 GU 毒性≥2 级为 22%-27%。LDR-BT 组观察到 67%的 GU 毒性≥2 级。最大 GI 毒性≥2 级的发生率为 9%。HDR-BT 组观察到 1%的 GI 毒性≥2 级和 19%的 GU 毒性≥2 级。

结论

所有类型的治疗均有效且患者接受度良好。HDR-BT 引起的晚期毒性最小,尤其是 GI 毒性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4a3/11272802/67a96942c29a/66_2024_2222_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验