Curatolo M, Petersen-Felix S, Arendt-Nielsen L, Giani C, Zbinden A M, Radanov B P
Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Bern, Inselspital, Switzerland.
Clin J Pain. 2001 Dec;17(4):306-15. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200112000-00004.
The mechanisms underlying chronic pain after whiplash injury are usually unclear. Injuries may cause sensitization of spinal cord neurons in animals (central hypersensitivity), which results in increased responsiveness to peripheral stimuli. In humans, the responsiveness of the central nervous system to peripheral stimulation may be explored by applying sensory tests to healthy tissues. The hypotheses of this study were: (1) chronic whiplash pain is associated with central hypersensitivity; (2) central hypersensitivity is maintained by nociception arising from the painful or tender muscles in the neck.
Comparison of patients with healthy controls.
Pain clinic and laboratory for pain research, university hospital.
Fourteen patients with chronic neck pain after whiplash injury (car accident) and 14 healthy volunteers.
Pain thresholds to: single electrical stimulus (intramuscular), repeated electrical stimulation (intramuscular and transcutaneous), and heat (transcutaneous). Each threshold was measured at neck and lower limb, before and after local anesthesia of the painful and tender muscles of the neck.
The whiplash group had significantly lower pain thresholds for all tests. except heat, at both neck and lower limb. Local anesthesia of the painful and tender points affected neither intensity of neck pain nor pain thresholds.
The authors found a hypersensitivity to peripheral stimulation in whiplash patients. Hypersensitivity was observed after cutaneous and muscular stimulation, at both neck and lower limb. Because hypersensitivity was observed in healthy tissues, it resulted from alterations in the central processing of sensory stimuli (central hypersensitivity). Central hypersensitivity was not dependent on a nociceptive input arising from the painful and tender muscles.
挥鞭样损伤后慢性疼痛的潜在机制通常不明。损伤可能导致动物脊髓神经元致敏(中枢性超敏反应),从而使对外周刺激的反应性增加。在人类中,可通过对健康组织进行感觉测试来探究中枢神经系统对外周刺激的反应性。本研究的假设为:(1)慢性挥鞭样疼痛与中枢性超敏反应有关;(2)中枢性超敏反应由颈部疼痛或压痛肌肉产生的伤害性感受维持。
患者与健康对照的比较。
大学医院的疼痛诊所和疼痛研究实验室。
14例挥鞭样损伤(车祸)后慢性颈部疼痛患者和14名健康志愿者。
对以下刺激的疼痛阈值:单次电刺激(肌内)、重复电刺激(肌内和经皮)以及热刺激(经皮)。每个阈值在颈部和下肢测量,在对颈部疼痛和压痛肌肉进行局部麻醉前后各测一次。
在所有测试中,除热刺激外,挥鞭样损伤组在颈部和下肢的疼痛阈值均显著更低。对疼痛和压痛点进行局部麻醉既不影响颈部疼痛强度,也不影响疼痛阈值。
作者发现挥鞭样损伤患者对外周刺激存在超敏反应。在颈部和下肢的皮肤和肌肉刺激后均观察到超敏反应。由于在健康组织中观察到超敏反应,其源于感觉刺激的中枢处理改变(中枢性超敏反应)。中枢性超敏反应不依赖于疼痛和压痛肌肉产生的伤害性传入。