Suppr超能文献

根据美国国家临床实验室标准委员会的新指南,选择三种抗生素对肺炎链球菌进行纸片扩散法药敏试验的抑菌圈大小解释标准。

Selection of zone size interpretive criteria for disk diffusion susceptibility tests of three antibiotics against Streptococcus pneumoniae, using the New Guidelines of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.

作者信息

Fuchs Peter C, Barry Arthur L, Brown Steven D

机构信息

The Clinical Microbiology Institute, Wilsonville, Oregon 97070, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Feb;46(2):398-401. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.2.398-401.2002.

Abstract

Disk diffusion and broth microdilution susceptibility tests were performed with cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, telithromycin, and erythromycin (control) against 407 selected isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Scattergrams were prepared from the results of these tests, and the current NCCLS guidelines for setting disk diffusion test interpretive criteria were applied. Erythromycin zone diameter breakpoints were confirmed. Telithromycin interpretive criteria for the disk test could be easily set with acceptable discrepancy rates. For cefotaxime and ceftriaxone, the minor discrepancy rates for MICs in the intermediate category +/- 1 dilution were far in excess of the acceptable 40% limit, i.e., 52 and 71%, respectively. We conclude that the 30-microg disk of these two drugs cannot be reliably used to test pneumococci.

摘要

采用头孢噻肟、头孢曲松、泰利霉素和红霉素(对照)对407株选定的肺炎链球菌分离株进行纸片扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法药敏试验。根据这些试验结果绘制散点图,并应用当前美国国家临床实验室标准委员会(NCCLS)制定纸片扩散试验解释标准的指南。确认了红霉素抑菌圈直径的断点。泰利霉素纸片试验的解释标准可以很容易地设定,且差异率可接受。对于头孢噻肟和头孢曲松,在中介类别中MICs +/- 1倍稀释的小差异率远远超过可接受的40%限值,分别为52%和71%。我们得出结论,这两种药物的30 μg纸片不能可靠地用于检测肺炎球菌。

相似文献

7

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验