Palloni A, Morenoff J D
Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706, USA.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Dec;954:140-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb02751.x.
This paper discusses problems that are common to both the epidemiologic risk-factor approach and the demographic variable-based approach to studying population health. We argue that there is a shared reluctance to move away from a narrow variable-based thinking that pervades both disciplines, and a tendency to reify the multivariate linear procedures employed in both disciplines. In particular, we concentrate on the difficulties generated by classical variable-based approaches that are especially striking when one neglects selection processes and the use of strategies to minimize its effects. We illustrate these difficulties in terms of the so-called "Hispanic Paradox", which refers to comparative health advantages that some Hispanic groups appear to have. We find that much of what is conceived by demographers and epidemiologists as a paradox may not be paradoxical at all.
本文讨论了流行病学风险因素法和基于人口统计学变量法在研究人群健康方面的共同问题。我们认为,这两个学科都普遍存在一种不愿摆脱狭隘的基于变量的思维方式的现象,以及将两学科中所采用的多元线性程序具体化的倾向。特别是,我们关注经典的基于变量的方法所产生的困难,当人们忽视选择过程以及为尽量减少其影响而使用的策略时,这些困难尤为突出。我们以所谓的“西班牙裔悖论”为例来说明这些困难,该悖论指的是一些西班牙裔群体似乎具有的相对健康优势。我们发现,人口统计学家和流行病学家所认为的许多悖论可能根本就不是悖论。