Suppr超能文献

了解死亡率的地理差异。

Understanding Geographic Disparities in Mortality.

机构信息

La Follette School of Public Affairs, Department of Population Health Sciences, and Center for Demography of Health and Aging, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Department of Sociology and Center for Demography of Health and Aging, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Demography. 2023 Apr 1;60(2):351-377. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10609710.

Abstract

A rich literature shows that early-life conditions shape later-life outcomes, including health and migration events. However, analyses of geographic disparities in mortality outcomes focus almost exclusively on contemporaneously measured geographic place (e.g., state of residence at death), thereby potentially conflating the role of early-life conditions, migration patterns, and effects of destinations. We employ the newly available Mortality Disparities in American Communities data set, which links respondents in the 2008 American Community Survey to official death records, and estimate consequential differences based on the method of aggregation we use: the unweighted mean absolute deviation of the difference in life expectancy at age 50 measured by state of birth versus state of residence is 0.58 years for men and 0.40 years for women. These differences are also spatially clustered, and we show that regional inequality in life expectancy is higher based on life expectancies by state of birth, implying that interstate migration mitigates baseline geographic inequality in mortality outcomes. Finally, we assess how state-specific features of in-migration, out-migration, and nonmigration together shape measures of mortality disparities by state (of residence), further demonstrating the difficulty of clearly interpreting these widely used measures.

摘要

丰富的文献表明,生命早期的条件会影响后期的结果,包括健康和迁移事件。然而,对死亡率结果的地理差异的分析几乎完全集中在同时测量的地理位置(例如,死亡时的居住州)上,从而可能混淆了生命早期条件、迁移模式以及目的地的影响。我们利用新的 Mortality Disparities in American Communities 数据集,该数据集将 2008 年美国社区调查中的受访者与官方死亡记录联系起来,并根据我们使用的聚合方法估计相应的差异:根据出生地与居住地测量的 50 岁时预期寿命差异的未加权平均绝对偏差,男性为 0.58 岁,女性为 0.40 岁。这些差异也呈现空间聚集性,我们表明,基于出生地的预期寿命,州际迁移减轻了死亡率结果的基本地理不平等,因此,预期寿命的区域不平等更高。最后,我们评估了移入、移出和非迁移的州内特定特征如何共同塑造按州(居住地)划分的死亡率差异衡量标准,进一步表明这些广泛使用的衡量标准的解释难度很大。

相似文献

1
Understanding Geographic Disparities in Mortality.了解死亡率的地理差异。
Demography. 2023 Apr 1;60(2):351-377. doi: 10.1215/00703370-10609710.
5
Where and When: Sharpening the lens on geographic disparities in mortality.地点与时间:聚焦死亡率的地理差异
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Oct 29;12:100680. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100680. eCollection 2020 Dec.
7
Unequal geographic distribution of life expectancy in Seoul.首尔地区预期寿命的地理分布不均。
Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015 Mar;27(2):NP1002-12. doi: 10.1177/1010539512443978. Epub 2012 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

3
Geographical variation in the long-arm of childhood.童年期的长臂在地理上的差异。
Health Place. 2025 Jan;91:103417. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2025.103417. Epub 2025 Jan 24.
7
Confronting health disparities: Lessons from the USA.直面健康差异:来自美国的经验教训。
Aging Med (Milton). 2024 Apr 18;7(2):158-161. doi: 10.1002/agm2.12303. eCollection 2024 Apr.

本文引用的文献

3
Do Liberal US State Policies Maximize Life Expectancy?美国自由派州政策能使预期寿命最大化吗?
Public Policy Aging Rep. 2021 Winter;31(1):7-13. doi: 10.1093/ppar/praa035. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
5
Where and When: Sharpening the lens on geographic disparities in mortality.地点与时间:聚焦死亡率的地理差异
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Oct 29;12:100680. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100680. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
US State Policies, Politics, and Life Expectancy.美国的州政策、政治与预期寿命
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):668-699. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12469. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
10
Adequate life-expectancy reconstruction for adult human mortality data.成人死亡率数据的充分预期寿命重建。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 4;13(6):e0198485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198485. eCollection 2018.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验