St Lawrence J S, Wilson T E, Eldridge G D, Brasfield T L, O'Bannon R E
Jackson State University, USA.
Am J Community Psychol. 2001 Dec;29(6):937-64. doi: 10.1023/A:1012919700096.
A community-based sample of disadvantaged African American women (n = 445) was recruited to participate in 1 of 3 theoretically driven experimental interventions based on either the theory of gender and power, social learning theory, or cognitive behavioral theory. Intervention outcomes were compared with a waiting list control condition. From baseline to postintervention, women in the experimental interventions showed differential change on cognitive indices (knowledge and attitudes) and skill acquisition (partner negotiation skills, correct condom application, lubricant selection, and information-provision to social networks) whereas control participants were unchanged. Women in the 3 experimental interventions also completed follow-up assessments for 1 year following the interventions. In all 3 experimental conditions, condom use increased relative to the control group and there were no differences between the experimental interventions. Women who participated in one of the theoretically grounded interventions continued to increase condom use over the following year. Women entering new relationships reported significantly more condom use than did women who remained in ongoing relationships. The findings suggest that intervention models that have proven effective for women who engage in high-risk behavior may be less effective for women in established relationships for whom risk is primarily derived from the extrarelationship behavior of their partners.
招募了一个以社区为基础的弱势非裔美国女性样本(n = 445),让她们参与基于性别与权力理论、社会学习理论或认知行为理论这三种理论驱动的实验性干预措施中的一种。将干预结果与等待名单对照条件进行比较。从基线到干预后,参与实验性干预的女性在认知指标(知识和态度)和技能获取(与伴侣谈判技能、正确使用避孕套、润滑剂选择以及向社交网络提供信息)方面表现出不同程度的变化,而对照参与者则没有变化。参与三种实验性干预的女性在干预后还进行了为期1年的随访评估。在所有三种实验条件下,避孕套使用相对于对照组均有所增加,且实验性干预之间没有差异。参与基于理论的干预措施之一的女性在接下来的一年中避孕套使用持续增加。进入新关系的女性报告的避孕套使用显著多于维持现有关系的女性。研究结果表明,已证明对从事高风险行为的女性有效的干预模式,对处于稳定关系中、风险主要源于伴侣婚外行为的女性可能效果较差。