Suppr超能文献

基于人群的男性衣原体筛查外展服务:一项随机试验的结果

Population-based outreach for Chlamydia screening in men: results from a randomized trial.

作者信息

Scholes Delia, Heidrich Fred E, Yarbro Patricia, Lindenbaum Jeff E, Marrazzo Jeanne M

机构信息

Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA 98101, USA.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Nov;34(11):837-9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31805ba860.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of population-based outreach strategies to improve genital Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) screening in men.

STUDY DESIGN

In a randomized trial, male enrollees ages 21-25 (n = 8820) were selected from the automated files of Group Health Cooperative and randomized to: a letter + test-request card for a CT urine home sampling kit (arm 1, n = 2940); a letter + mail-back sampling kit (arm 2, n = 2940); or a usual care control (arm 3, n = 2940). One reminder was sent to arms 1 and 2. The outcome was CT testing rates in the 4 months postrandomization.

RESULTS

105 of 2940 (3.6%) men in arm 1 and 230 of 2940 (7.8%) in arm 2 returned mailed specimens. All 335 respondents were sexually experienced, 43% had >2 sex partners in the past year, and 80% reported no genitourinary symptoms. Compared to arm 3, the relative risk of being tested was 5.6 (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.6-8.7) for arm 1 and 11.1 (95% CI 7.3-16.9) for arm 2. Arm 2 was significantly more likely to be tested than arm 1. CT prevalence for mailed-back specimens was 1.0% (1 of 105) for arm 1 and 2.6% (6 of 230) for arm 2; 70% of all positive intervention tests were from mailed samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Both strategies resulted in significantly higher CT testing than usual care, but the intervention response rate was low (5.7% overall). Direct kit mailing performed best. In US populations, the value of mailed outreach strategies to men must be considered in the context of other CT screening priorities.

摘要

目的

评估基于人群的外展策略在改善男性沙眼衣原体(CT)筛查方面的可行性和有效性。

研究设计

在一项随机试验中,从健康合作组织的自动档案中选取年龄在21至25岁之间的男性参与者(n = 8820),并随机分为:一张CT尿液家庭采样试剂盒的信件 + 测试请求卡(第1组,n = 2940);一封信件 + 回邮采样试剂盒(第2组,n = 2940);或常规护理对照组(第3组,n = 2940)。向第1组和第2组发送了一次提醒。结果是随机分组后4个月内的CT检测率。

结果

第1组2940名男性中有105名(3.6%),第2组2940名男性中有230名(7.8%)返回了邮寄的样本。所有335名受访者都有性经历,43%的人在过去一年中有超过2个性伴侣,80%的人报告没有泌尿生殖系统症状。与第3组相比,第1组接受检测的相对风险为5.6(95%置信区间(CI)3.6 - 8.7),第2组为11.1(95%CI 7.3 - 16.9)。第2组接受检测的可能性明显高于第1组。第1组回邮样本的CT患病率为1.0%(105例中的1例),第2组为2.6%(230例中的6例);所有阳性干预检测的70%来自邮寄样本。

结论

两种策略都使CT检测率显著高于常规护理,但干预反应率较低(总体为5.7%)。直接邮寄试剂盒效果最佳。在美国人群中,必须在其他CT筛查重点的背景下考虑向男性邮寄外展策略的价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验