Andersen Berit, Gundgaard Jens, Kretzschmar Mirjam, Olsen Jens, Welte Robert, Oster-Gaard Lars
Department of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sex Transm Dis. 2006 Jul;33(7):407-15. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000200609.77577.3f.
To estimate the incremental effects and costs of a home sampling screening approach for Chlamydia trachomatis over the current in-office screening practice in Denmark.
To assess the effect of a new screening strategy.
A dynamic Monte Carlo model estimated prevalence and incidence over 10 years for a home sampling screening program and the current in-office screening. Subsequently, the incremental number of major outcomes averted (MOA) and the related direct and indirect costs were estimated.
Infection prevalence after 10 years was 1.0% with a home sampling program and 4.2% with the current in-office screening practice. The total costs per MOA reached 3186 US dollars during the first year of the home sampling strategy, but in year 4, the accumulated indirect costs offset the direct costs, and the program henceforth saved society costs.
Home sampling should be considered a relevant alternative to the current practice of in-office screening.
评估与丹麦目前的门诊筛查方法相比,沙眼衣原体家庭采样筛查方法的增量效果和成本。
评估一种新筛查策略的效果。
一个动态蒙特卡洛模型估计了家庭采样筛查项目和当前门诊筛查在10年内的患病率和发病率。随后,估计了避免的主要结局增量数(MOA)以及相关的直接和间接成本。
家庭采样项目实施10年后的感染患病率为1.0%,当前门诊筛查方法的患病率为4.2%。在家庭采样策略实施的第一年,每避免一个主要结局的总成本达到3186美元,但在第4年,累积的间接成本抵消了直接成本,此后该项目为社会节省了成本。
家庭采样应被视为当前门诊筛查方法的一种合理替代方案。