Gysen Veerle, De Graef Peter, Verfaillie Karl
Department of Psychology, University of Leuven, Tiensestraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Vision Res. 2002 Feb;42(3):379-91. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00296-6.
In a display with a stationary and a moving object, subjects saccaded towards one of the objects and had to detect intrasaccadic changes in position or orientation of either the saccade target or the saccade flanker. Compared to performance for stationary objects, displacement detection for translating objects was better and unaffected by saccadic status of the changed object. This pattern proved to be specific to position changes in translating objects and did not generalize to other types of motion (i.e., rotation) or to other types of intrasaccadic changes (i.e., orientation shifts). Superior transsaccadic coding of the position of a translating object was also observed in control experiments with only a single object present on each trial. Possible accounts in terms of selective attention to moving objects and perceptual relevance of object position are pitted against the data, suggesting qualitative differences in the transsaccadic representation of translating and stationary objects.
在一个包含静止物体和运动物体的展示中,受试者向其中一个物体进行眼跳,并必须检测眼跳目标或眼跳侧翼在眼跳过程中位置或方向的变化。与静止物体的表现相比,对平移物体的位移检测更好,并且不受变化物体眼跳状态的影响。这种模式被证明是平移物体位置变化所特有的,并不适用于其他类型的运动(即旋转)或其他类型的眼跳过程中的变化(即方向偏移)。在每次试验中仅呈现单个物体的对照实验中,也观察到了对平移物体位置的卓越跨眼跳编码。根据对运动物体的选择性注意和物体位置的感知相关性提出的可能解释与数据相矛盾,这表明平移物体和静止物体的跨眼跳表征存在质的差异。