Karlowsky James A, Kelly Laurie J, Thornsberry Clyde, Jones Mark E, Evangelista Alan T, Critchley Ian A, Sahm Daniel F
Focus Technologies Inc., 13665 Dulles Technology Drive, Herndon, VA 20171, USA.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Jan;19(1):21-31. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00466-6.
From January to May 2000, as part of the Tracking Resistance in the United States Today (TRUST) surveillance initiative, clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n=2519) and non-fermentative Gram-negatives (n=580) were prospectively collected from 26 hospital laboratories across the United States. Isolates were tested for susceptibility to three fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin) and seven other agents. In addition, data for the same period were collected from The Surveillance Network (TSN) Database-USA, an electronic surveillance network that receives data from more than 200 laboratories in the US. Both surveillance methods produced similar results. Against isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, imipenem was the most active agent, followed by the fluoroquinolones; > or = 86.7% of isolates of all species of Enterobacteriaceae except Providencia spp. were susceptible to fluoroquinolones by TRUST and TSN surveillance. TRUST identified differences in susceptibility to the three fluoroquinolones of > or = 2% for Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter cloacae, Proteus mirabilis and Serratia marcescens. Isolates of P. mirabilis were considerably more susceptible to levofloxacin (94.0%) than to ciprofloxacin (87.7%) and gatifloxacin (87.7%). Other results from TRUST included Pseudomonas aeruginosa being slightly more susceptible to ciprofloxacin (73.5%) and levofloxacin (73.0%) than gatifloxacin (71.0%). Imipenem was the only compound with significant activity (95.1% susceptible, TRUST; 87.4% susceptible, TSN) against Acinetobacter baumannii, but it was inactive against Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. S. maltophilia isolates were more susceptible to levofloxacin and gatifloxacin (77.7-79.8%) than ciprofloxacin (29.7-33.0%). Against 513 urinary isolates of Escherichia coli in TRUST, levofloxacin, gatifloxacin and ciprofloxacin were equipotent. Age and gender had no clear effect on the activity of levofloxacin, ciprofloxacin or gatifloxacin. Similar results for all three fluoroquinolones were seen in outpatients and inpatients. TRUST and TSN data indicated that resistance rates had not changed appreciably for any compound studied since a similar study conducted in 1999. TRUST centralized in vitro and electronic (TSN) surveillance methods provided an effective strategy for monitoring trends in resistance.
2000年1月至5月,作为“今日美国耐药性追踪”(TRUST)监测计划的一部分,从美国26家医院实验室前瞻性收集了肠杆菌科细菌(n = 2519)和非发酵革兰阴性菌(n = 580)的临床分离株。对分离株进行了三种氟喹诺酮类药物(环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星、加替沙星)及其他七种药物的敏感性测试。此外,还从美国监测网络(TSN)数据库收集了同期数据,该数据库是一个电子监测网络,接收来自美国200多家实验室的数据。两种监测方法得出了相似的结果。对于肠杆菌科细菌分离株,亚胺培南是活性最强的药物,其次是氟喹诺酮类药物;TRUST和TSN监测显示,除普罗威登斯菌属外,所有肠杆菌科菌种的分离株中≥86.7%对氟喹诺酮类药物敏感。TRUST发现,柠檬酸杆菌属、阴沟肠杆菌、奇异变形杆菌和粘质沙雷菌对三种氟喹诺酮类药物的敏感性差异≥2%。奇异变形杆菌分离株对左氧氟沙星(94.0%)的敏感性明显高于环丙沙星(87.7%)和加替沙星(87.7%)。TRUST的其他结果包括,铜绿假单胞菌对环丙沙星(73.5%)和左氧氟沙星(73.0%)的敏感性略高于加替沙星(71.0%)。亚胺培南是对鲍曼不动杆菌具有显著活性的唯一化合物(TRUST监测中95.1%敏感;TSN监测中87.4%敏感),但对嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌无活性。嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌分离株对左氧氟沙星和加替沙星(77.7 - 79.8%)的敏感性高于环丙沙星(29.7 - 33.0%)。在TRUST监测的513株大肠埃希菌尿液分离株中,左氧氟沙星、加替沙星和环丙沙星的效力相当。年龄和性别对左氧氟沙星、环丙沙星或加替沙星的活性没有明显影响。门诊患者和住院患者中三种氟喹诺酮类药物的结果相似。TRUST和TSN数据表明,自1999年进行类似研究以来,所研究的任何化合物的耐药率均未出现明显变化。TRUST集中的体外监测和电子(TSN)监测方法为监测耐药性趋势提供了有效的策略。