• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初始经验性治疗与社区获得性肺炎住院退伍军人患者住院时间缩短之间的关联。

Association between initial empirical therapy and decreased length of stay among veteran patients hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia.

作者信息

Lentino Joseph R, Krasnicka Barbara

机构信息

Section of Infectious Diseases (111P), Medical Service, Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL 60141, USA.

出版信息

Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Jan;19(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00472-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00472-1
PMID:11814769
Abstract

This investigation assessed the impact of initial empirical antimicrobial therapy on the outcome of therapy for community acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients and on patients' length of stay (LOS) in the hospital. Hospital records for 165 patients with pneumonia admitted to the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital between 1 October 1997, and 31 March 2000, were reviewed. Criteria for CAP were met for 92 of 165 patients. Comparisons were made between patients treated with azithromycin and with other parenteral antibiotics (the reference group). No statistical differences were observed between the treatment groups for the risk factors. The azithromycin group patients were slightly older with a mean age of 69 years versus 66 years (P=0.23). Patients treated with parenteral azithromycin had on average, a shorter length of hospitalization namely 4.6 days compared with 9.7 days for patients treated with the other antibiotics (log-rank test, P=0.0001). In order to make the two groups of patients more alike we considered patients' data set without intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. The conclusion was the same namely azithromycin monotherapy was associated with a decreased duration of hospital stay.

摘要

本研究评估了初始经验性抗菌治疗对社区获得性肺炎(CAP)患者治疗结局及住院时间(LOS)的影响。回顾了1997年10月1日至2000年3月31日期间入住小爱德华·海因斯退伍军人医院的165例肺炎患者的医院记录。165例患者中有92例符合CAP标准。对接受阿奇霉素治疗的患者与接受其他胃肠外抗生素治疗的患者(参照组)进行了比较。各治疗组在危险因素方面未观察到统计学差异。阿奇霉素组患者年龄稍大,平均年龄为69岁,而另一组为66岁(P = 0.23)。接受胃肠外阿奇霉素治疗的患者平均住院时间较短,为4.6天,而接受其他抗生素治疗的患者为9.7天(对数秩检验,P = 0.0001)。为使两组患者更具可比性,我们考虑了未入住重症监护病房(ICU)患者的数据集。结论相同,即阿奇霉素单药治疗与住院时间缩短相关。

相似文献

1
Association between initial empirical therapy and decreased length of stay among veteran patients hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia.初始经验性治疗与社区获得性肺炎住院退伍军人患者住院时间缩短之间的关联。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Jan;19(1):61-6. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00472-1.
2
Azithromycin monotherapy for patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: a 31/2-year experience from a veterans affairs hospital.阿奇霉素单药治疗社区获得性肺炎住院患者:一家退伍军人事务医院3.5年的经验
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1718-26. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.14.1718.
3
Is gentamicin safe and effective for severe community-acquired pneumonia? An 8-year retrospective cohort study.庆大霉素治疗重症社区获得性肺炎安全有效吗?一项 8 年回顾性队列研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Jun;51(6):862-866. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 May 18.
4
Is azithromycin the first-choice macrolide for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia?阿奇霉素是治疗社区获得性肺炎的首选大环内酯类药物吗?
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 May 15;36(10):1239-45. doi: 10.1086/374846. Epub 2003 May 6.
5
Poor outcomes of empiric ceftriaxone ± azithromycin for community-acquired pneumonia caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.经验性使用头孢曲松±阿奇霉素治疗由甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌引起的社区获得性肺炎的效果不佳。
Intern Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;11(4):545-51. doi: 10.1007/s11739-015-1345-y. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
6
Azithromycin plus β-lactam versus levofloxacin plus β-lactam for severe community-acquired pneumonia: A retrospective nationwide database analysis.阿奇霉素联合β-内酰胺类药物与左氧氟沙星联合β-内酰胺类药物治疗重症社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较:一项回顾性全国性数据库分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2019 Dec;25(12):1012-1018. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.05.027. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
7
Guideline-concordant antibiotic use and survival among patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to the intensive care unit.指南一致的抗生素使用与 ICU 收治的社区获得性肺炎患者的生存。
Clin Ther. 2010 Feb;32(2):293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2010.02.006.
8
Comparison of beta-lactam and macrolide combination therapy versus fluoroquinolone monotherapy in hospitalized Veterans Affairs patients with community-acquired pneumonia.退伍军人事务部住院社区获得性肺炎患者中β-内酰胺类与大环内酯类联合治疗与氟喹诺酮类单药治疗的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Nov;51(11):3977-82. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00006-07. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
9
Medical resource utilization among community-acquired pneumonia patients initially treated with levofloxacin 750 mg daily versus ceftriaxone 1000 mg plus azithromycin 500 mg daily: a US-based study.初始接受每日750毫克左氧氟沙星治疗与每日1000毫克头孢曲松加500毫克阿奇霉素治疗的社区获得性肺炎患者的医疗资源利用情况:一项美国的研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Apr;25(4):859-68. doi: 10.1185/03007990902779749.
10
Outcomes of Macrolide Deescalation in Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia.大环内酯类药物降级治疗重症社区获得性肺炎的结果。
Clin Ther. 2019 Dec;41(12):2540-2548. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of beta-lactam and macrolide combination therapy versus fluoroquinolone monotherapy in hospitalized Veterans Affairs patients with community-acquired pneumonia.退伍军人事务部住院社区获得性肺炎患者中β-内酰胺类与大环内酯类联合治疗与氟喹诺酮类单药治疗的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Nov;51(11):3977-82. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00006-07. Epub 2007 Aug 20.