Walker P
Br J Psychol. 1975 Aug;66(3):347-56. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01471.x.
An analogy is drawn between the perceptual limitation that characterizes the dichotic listening paradigm and the 'suppression' that occurs in binocular rivalry when different stimuli are presented to the two eyes. An experiment is reported which focuses on the fate of the information residing in a suppressed eye (unattended channel) during binocular rivalry. It is demonstrated that the temporal course of rivalry is sensitive to the presence of a subliminal moving stimulus within the currently suppressed field. The effects are seen to confirm a literal interpretation of Levelt's (1966) thesis which relates changes in the 'stimulus strength' of a rivalling field to subsequent changes in the temporal course of the phenomenon. This interpretation is consistent with the hypothesis that, despite phenomenal suppression, a full analysis is undertaken on the currently non-dominant stimulus. The data are related to models of selective attention, and to the notion that there are parallel visual systems.
人们将双耳分听范式所具有的感知局限性与双眼竞争中当不同刺激呈现给两只眼睛时发生的“抑制”进行了类比。本文报告了一项实验,该实验聚焦于双眼竞争期间存在于被抑制眼(未被关注通道)中的信息的命运。结果表明,竞争的时间进程对当前被抑制视野中阈下移动刺激的存在很敏感。这些效应证实了莱尔特(1966年)论点的字面解释,该论点将竞争视野的“刺激强度”变化与该现象时间进程的后续变化联系起来。这种解释与以下假设一致:尽管存在现象学上的抑制,但仍会对当前非主导刺激进行全面分析。这些数据与选择性注意模型以及存在平行视觉系统的观点相关。