Bossink C J, Stalmeier P F, De Weert C M
University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen Institute for Cognition and Information (NICI), The Netherlands.
Vision Res. 1993 Jul;33(10):1413-9. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90047-z.
Levelt's second proposition (1968) was tested by investigating the effect of increasing the stimulus strength on the ipsilateral mean dominance duration. In three experiments, three stimulus dimensions were investigated: luminance contrast, colour contrast, and motion velocity. We included an experiment similar to Levelt's own equipment, in which a reversed contrast stimulus was used. In all three experiments, including the Levelt disk-ring experiment, the proposition was rejected. We conclude that Levelt's proposition cannot always be generalized to a broad class of stimulus dimensions and therefore cannot be held against reciprocal inhibition models.
莱尔特的第二个命题(1968年)通过研究增加刺激强度对同侧平均优势持续时间的影响进行了检验。在三个实验中,研究了三个刺激维度:亮度对比度、颜色对比度和运动速度。我们纳入了一个与莱尔特自己的设备类似的实验,其中使用了反向对比度刺激。在所有三个实验中,包括莱尔特的圆盘-圆环实验,该命题均被否定。我们得出结论,莱尔特的命题不能总是推广到广泛的刺激维度类别,因此不能用来反对相互抑制模型。