Suppr超能文献

最小临床重要差异(MCID)的多面性:文献综述与未来研究方向

Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research.

作者信息

Beaton Dorcas E, Boers Marteen, Wells George A

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002 Mar;14(2):109-14. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200203000-00006.

Abstract

The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for an instrument is a much sought after, but elusive figure. In this review we will highlight new findings in this area, including taxonomy of MCID, methods used to ascertain MCID, the perspective taken for evaluating importance, and other sources of variation for MCID values. In the end we believe the MCID will be a context-specific value rather than a fixed number. The review highlights the need to do methodological research in this area, especially concurrent comparisons between approaches, or across different patient groups. There are many faces to the MCID, it is not a simple concept, nor simple to calculate.

摘要

一种测量工具的最小临床重要差异(MCID)是一个备受追捧但难以捉摸的数值。在本综述中,我们将重点介绍该领域的新发现,包括MCID的分类、确定MCID所使用的方法、评估重要性所采用的视角,以及MCID值的其他变异来源。最后,我们认为MCID将是一个因具体情况而异的值,而非一个固定数字。该综述强调了在这一领域开展方法学研究的必要性,尤其是对不同方法之间或不同患者群体之间进行同步比较。MCID有诸多方面,它不是一个简单的概念,计算起来也不简单。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验