Beaton Dorcas E, Boers Marteen, Wells George A
Department of Occupational Therapy, Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002 Mar;14(2):109-14. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200203000-00006.
The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for an instrument is a much sought after, but elusive figure. In this review we will highlight new findings in this area, including taxonomy of MCID, methods used to ascertain MCID, the perspective taken for evaluating importance, and other sources of variation for MCID values. In the end we believe the MCID will be a context-specific value rather than a fixed number. The review highlights the need to do methodological research in this area, especially concurrent comparisons between approaches, or across different patient groups. There are many faces to the MCID, it is not a simple concept, nor simple to calculate.
一种测量工具的最小临床重要差异(MCID)是一个备受追捧但难以捉摸的数值。在本综述中,我们将重点介绍该领域的新发现,包括MCID的分类、确定MCID所使用的方法、评估重要性所采用的视角,以及MCID值的其他变异来源。最后,我们认为MCID将是一个因具体情况而异的值,而非一个固定数字。该综述强调了在这一领域开展方法学研究的必要性,尤其是对不同方法之间或不同患者群体之间进行同步比较。MCID有诸多方面,它不是一个简单的概念,计算起来也不简单。