• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[急性挥鞭样损伤早期活动的结果]

[Results of early mobilisation of acute whiplash injuries].

作者信息

Schnabel M, Vassiliou T, Schmidt T, Basler H D, Gotzen L, Junge A, Kaluza G

机构信息

Klinik für Unfallchirurgie der Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Schmerz. 2002 Feb;16(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s004820100087.

DOI:10.1007/s004820100087
PMID:11845337
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic management of acute neck pain after whiplash is a frequent but unsolved clinical problem. Long-lasting symptoms and disability are common. Former studies proposed beneficial effects of physiotherapy in the early management of whiplash injury. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of early active mobilization versus standard treatment with a soft cervical collar.

METHODS

Between August 1997 and February 2000 a prospective randomized clinical trial with a total of 168 patients was performed. Of these patients 81 (31 male, 50 female; average age 28,78 years) were randomly assigned to the standard therapy group, which received a soft cervical collar, and 87 (31 male, 56 female; average age 29,62 years) to the early mobilization group, treated by physiotherapy. Study participants documented pain and disability twice (baseline and six week follow-up) during a one week period by diary, using numeric rating scales ranging from 0 to 10.

RESULTS

The initial mean pain intensity (4,75) reported by the standard therapy group was similar to disability (4,76). There were no significant differences to initial pain (4,50) and disability (4,39) reported by the early mobilization group. The mean pain intensity reported by the standard therapy group after 6 weeks was 2,66 and disability was 2,40. The mean pain intensity indicated by physiotherapy group was 1,44 and mean disability was 1,29. The differences between the groups were both significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Early mobilization is superior to the standard therapy regarding pain intensity and disability. We conclude that mobilization should be recommended as the new adequate standard-therapy in the acute management of whiplash injury.

摘要

背景

挥鞭样损伤后急性颈部疼痛的诊断评估和治疗管理是一个常见但尚未解决的临床问题。长期症状和残疾很常见。以前的研究提出物理治疗在挥鞭样损伤的早期管理中有有益作用。本研究的目的是评估早期主动活动与使用软颈托的标准治疗的效果。

方法

在1997年8月至2000年2月期间,进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验,共有168例患者。这些患者中,81例(31例男性,50例女性;平均年龄28.78岁)被随机分配到标准治疗组,接受软颈托治疗,87例(31例男性,56例女性;平均年龄29.62岁)被分配到早期活动组,接受物理治疗。研究参与者在一周内通过日记两次(基线和六周随访)记录疼痛和残疾情况,使用0至10的数字评分量表。

结果

标准治疗组报告的初始平均疼痛强度(4.75)与残疾程度(4.76)相似。与早期活动组报告的初始疼痛(4.50)和残疾程度(4.39)没有显著差异。标准治疗组六周后的平均疼痛强度为2.66,残疾程度为2.40。物理治疗组的平均疼痛强度为1.44,平均残疾程度为1.29。两组之间的差异均具有显著性。

结论

在疼痛强度和残疾程度方面,早期活动优于标准治疗。我们得出结论,在挥鞭样损伤的急性管理中,应推荐活动作为新的适当标准治疗方法。

相似文献

1
[Results of early mobilisation of acute whiplash injuries].[急性挥鞭样损伤早期活动的结果]
Schmerz. 2002 Feb;16(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s004820100087.
2
Neck collar, "act-as-usual" or active mobilization for whiplash injury? A randomized parallel-group trial.颈托、“照常活动”还是积极活动来治疗挥鞭伤?一项随机平行组试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 15;32(6):618-26. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000257535.77691.bd.
3
Physical therapy and active exercises--an adequate treatment for prevention of late whiplash syndrome? Randomized controlled trial in 200 patients.物理治疗和主动运动——预防迟发性挥鞭样综合征的充分治疗方法?对200名患者的随机对照试验。
Pain. 2006 Sep;124(1-2):69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.03.017. Epub 2006 May 11.
4
Education by general practitioners or education and exercises by physiotherapists for patients with whiplash-associated disorders? A randomized clinical trial.全科医生对挥鞭样相关疾病患者进行的教育,还是物理治疗师进行的教育及锻炼?一项随机临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):723-31. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206381.15224.0f.
5
Randomised, controlled outcome study of active mobilisation compared with collar therapy for whiplash injury.鞭打损伤主动活动与颈托治疗的随机对照结局研究。
Emerg Med J. 2004 May;21(3):306-10. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.010165.
6
Comparison of the relative benefits of 2 versus 10 days of soft collar cervical immobilization after acute whiplash injury.急性挥鞭伤后使用软颈托固定2天与10天的相对益处比较。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Nov;87(11):1423-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.07.268.
7
Active intervention in patients with whiplash-associated disorders improves long-term prognosis: a randomized controlled clinical trial.对挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者进行积极干预可改善长期预后:一项随机对照临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Nov 15;28(22):2491-8. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000090822.96814.13.
8
The effect of a fear-avoidance-based physical therapy intervention for patients with acute low back pain: results of a randomized clinical trial.基于恐惧回避的物理治疗干预对急性下腰痛患者的影响:一项随机临床试验的结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Dec 1;28(23):2551-60. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000096677.84605.A2.
9
[Sprain of the cervical spine: early functional vs. immobilization treatment].[颈椎扭伤:早期功能治疗与固定治疗对比]
Zentralbl Chir. 1997;122(7):517-21.
10
Education of patients after whiplash injury: is oral advice any better than a pamphlet?挥鞭伤后患者的教育:口头建议比宣传册更好吗?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Oct 15;33(22):E843-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318182bee2.

引用本文的文献

1
Massage for neck pain.颈部疼痛按摩。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 28;2(2):CD004871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004871.pub5.
2
Therapy recommendation "act as usual" in patients with whiplash injuries QTF I°.对于挥鞭样损伤QTF I°患者的治疗建议为“照常生活”。
Glob J Health Sci. 2012 Aug 20;4(6):36-42. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v4n6p36.
3
Grade II whiplash injuries to the neck: what is the benefit for patients treated by different physical therapy modalities?颈部二级挥鞭伤:不同物理治疗方式对患者有何益处?
Patient Saf Surg. 2009 Jan 16;3(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-3-2.
4
Conservative treatments for whiplash.挥鞭样损伤的保守治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;2007(2):CD003338. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003338.pub3.
5
[Diagnosis and therapy of acute complaints after "whiplash injury" in Germany. Results of a representative survey at surgical and trauma departments in Germany].[德国“挥鞭样损伤”后急性症状的诊断与治疗。德国外科和创伤科代表性调查结果]
Unfallchirurg. 2004 Apr;107(4):300-6. doi: 10.1007/s00113-004-0740-z.