Schnabel M, Vassiliou T, Schmidt T, Basler H D, Gotzen L, Junge A, Kaluza G
Klinik für Unfallchirurgie der Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.
Schmerz. 2002 Feb;16(1):15-21. doi: 10.1007/s004820100087.
Diagnostic evaluation and therapeutic management of acute neck pain after whiplash is a frequent but unsolved clinical problem. Long-lasting symptoms and disability are common. Former studies proposed beneficial effects of physiotherapy in the early management of whiplash injury. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of early active mobilization versus standard treatment with a soft cervical collar.
Between August 1997 and February 2000 a prospective randomized clinical trial with a total of 168 patients was performed. Of these patients 81 (31 male, 50 female; average age 28,78 years) were randomly assigned to the standard therapy group, which received a soft cervical collar, and 87 (31 male, 56 female; average age 29,62 years) to the early mobilization group, treated by physiotherapy. Study participants documented pain and disability twice (baseline and six week follow-up) during a one week period by diary, using numeric rating scales ranging from 0 to 10.
The initial mean pain intensity (4,75) reported by the standard therapy group was similar to disability (4,76). There were no significant differences to initial pain (4,50) and disability (4,39) reported by the early mobilization group. The mean pain intensity reported by the standard therapy group after 6 weeks was 2,66 and disability was 2,40. The mean pain intensity indicated by physiotherapy group was 1,44 and mean disability was 1,29. The differences between the groups were both significant.
Early mobilization is superior to the standard therapy regarding pain intensity and disability. We conclude that mobilization should be recommended as the new adequate standard-therapy in the acute management of whiplash injury.
挥鞭样损伤后急性颈部疼痛的诊断评估和治疗管理是一个常见但尚未解决的临床问题。长期症状和残疾很常见。以前的研究提出物理治疗在挥鞭样损伤的早期管理中有有益作用。本研究的目的是评估早期主动活动与使用软颈托的标准治疗的效果。
在1997年8月至2000年2月期间,进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验,共有168例患者。这些患者中,81例(31例男性,50例女性;平均年龄28.78岁)被随机分配到标准治疗组,接受软颈托治疗,87例(31例男性,56例女性;平均年龄29.62岁)被分配到早期活动组,接受物理治疗。研究参与者在一周内通过日记两次(基线和六周随访)记录疼痛和残疾情况,使用0至10的数字评分量表。
标准治疗组报告的初始平均疼痛强度(4.75)与残疾程度(4.76)相似。与早期活动组报告的初始疼痛(4.50)和残疾程度(4.39)没有显著差异。标准治疗组六周后的平均疼痛强度为2.66,残疾程度为2.40。物理治疗组的平均疼痛强度为1.44,平均残疾程度为1.29。两组之间的差异均具有显著性。
在疼痛强度和残疾程度方面,早期活动优于标准治疗。我们得出结论,在挥鞭样损伤的急性管理中,应推荐活动作为新的适当标准治疗方法。