Skinner T Chas, Hampson Sarah E, Fife-Schaw Chris
Department of Psychology, University of Bath, United Kingdom.
Health Psychol. 2002 Jan;21(1):61-70.
This study compared 3 models of association between personality, personal model beliefs, and self-care in a cross-sectional design. These models were as follows: (a) Emotional stability determines self-care indirectly through personal model beliefs, and conscientiousness is a direct predictor of self-care; (b) emotional stability determines self-care indirectly through personal model beliefs, and conscientiousness moderates the association between beliefs and self-care; (c) both emotional stability and conscientiousness determine self-care indirectly through personal model beliefs. Participants (N = 358, aged 12-30 years) with Type 1 diabetes completed measures of personality, personal model beliefs, and self-care. Structural equation modeling indicated that Model C was the best fit to the data.
本研究采用横断面设计比较了人格、个人模型信念和自我护理之间的3种关联模型。这些模型如下:(a)情绪稳定性通过个人模型信念间接决定自我护理,尽责性是自我护理的直接预测因素;(b)情绪稳定性通过个人模型信念间接决定自我护理,尽责性调节信念与自我护理之间的关联;(c)情绪稳定性和尽责性均通过个人模型信念间接决定自我护理。1型糖尿病患者(N = 358,年龄12 - 30岁)完成了人格、个人模型信念和自我护理的测量。结构方程模型表明模型C最符合数据。