Poirier L J
J Neural Transm. 1975;37(3):209-18. doi: 10.1007/BF01670129.
Several factors must be taken into consideration in order to establish whether or not 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) introduced in the CNS more or less selectively destroys monoaminergic and, more especially, catecholaminergic structures. These include an assessment of all elements possibly damaged following different sites of injection in various species, a comparison with the effects of known neurotoxic agents, the degree of diffusion and/or of dilution of the substance used, the assessment of associated behavioral, neurochemical and morphological changes in the light of the known topography of brain nervous structures etc. A comparison of the effects of 6-OHDA and of peroxide (H2O2) introduced in the CNS suggests that both agents produced similar morphological changes in various sites of the brains of cats and rats. In the light of various data in the literature and of the results reported in this study it appears that 6-OHDA which may be used to induce a focal lesion cannot be regarded as a specific neurotoxic agent.
为了确定引入中枢神经系统的6-羟基多巴胺(6-OHDA)是否或多或少选择性地破坏单胺能结构,尤其是儿茶酚胺能结构,必须考虑几个因素。这些因素包括评估在不同物种的不同注射部位后可能受损的所有因素,与已知神经毒性剂的作用进行比较,所用物质的扩散和/或稀释程度,根据已知的脑神经结构地形图评估相关的行为、神经化学和形态学变化等。对引入中枢神经系统的6-OHDA和过氧化物(H2O2)的作用进行比较表明,这两种剂在猫和大鼠大脑的各个部位产生了相似的形态学变化。根据文献中的各种数据和本研究报告的结果,似乎可用于诱导局灶性病变的6-OHDA不能被视为一种特异性神经毒性剂。