• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

男性和女性判断中的复杂性、极端性及情感因素。

Complexity, extremity, and affect in male and female judgments.

作者信息

Deaux K, Farris E

出版信息

J Pers. 1975 Sep;43(3):379-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00711.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00711.x
PMID:1185485
Abstract

Two studies were conducted to elucidate aspects of the interpersonal judement process as it is applied to and by males and females. Measurement of judgments by means of the Role Construct Repertory Test allowed consideration of cognitive complexity scores, as well as the use of extreme ratings and a total affective rating. Consistent findings from both studies suggest that males and females differ in their use of extreme scores and total affective ratings, but not in complexity. Characteristics of the stimulus person affect each of the three dependent measures. Interrelationships among the three judgmental measures provide information about the methodological and conceptual interplay of various factors in interpersonal judgment.

摘要

进行了两项研究,以阐明人际判断过程应用于男性和女性以及由男性和女性进行时的各个方面。通过角色构念 repertory 测验来测量判断,这使得能够考虑认知复杂性得分,以及极端评分和总体情感评分的使用。两项研究的一致结果表明,男性和女性在极端得分和总体情感评分的使用上存在差异,但在复杂性方面没有差异。刺激对象的特征会影响这三项因变量指标中的每一项。这三项判断指标之间的相互关系提供了关于人际判断中各种因素在方法和概念上相互作用的信息。

相似文献

1
Complexity, extremity, and affect in male and female judgments.男性和女性判断中的复杂性、极端性及情感因素。
J Pers. 1975 Sep;43(3):379-89. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00711.x.
2
The self and social judgment: effects of affective reaction and "own position" on judgments of unambiguous and ambiguous information about others.自我与社会判断:情感反应和“自身立场”对关于他人的明确和模糊信息判断的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Dec;61(6):884-97. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.6.884.
3
Interpersonal orientation and the accuracy of personality judgments.人际取向与人格判断的准确性。
J Pers. 2003 Apr;71(2):267-95. doi: 10.1111/1467-6494.7102005.
4
On the accuracy of ratings of personality by strangers.陌生人对人格的评分准确性研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Sep;61(3):471-7. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.3.471.
5
Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM).情绪与判断:情感注入模型(AIM)
Psychol Bull. 1995 Jan;117(1):39-66. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.39.
6
Sex Differences in Judgments of Social Desirability.社会期望判断中的性别差异。
J Pers. 2016 Aug;84(4):423-32. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12169. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
7
Self-other agreement of personality judgments in job interviews: exploring the effects of trait, gender, age and social desirability.求职面试中个性判断的自我-他人一致性:探究特质、性别、年龄及社会赞许性的影响
Scand J Psychol. 2014 Oct;55(5):520-6. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12154. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
8
Mood effects on person-perception judgments.情绪对人物感知判断的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jul;53(1):53-60. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.53.1.53.
9
Confidence and accuracy in trait inference: judgment by similarity.特质推断中的信心与准确性:基于相似性的判断。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 1996 Jun;92(1):33-57. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(95)00005-4.
10
Person memory and judgment.个人记忆与判断力。
Psychol Rev. 1989 Jan;96(1):58-83. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.96.1.58.