• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我与他人取向及爱德华个人偏好量表

Self-other orientations and the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule.

作者信息

Santee R T

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1975 Jun;39(3):293-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa3903_11.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa3903_11
PMID:1185498
Abstract

Because the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule (EPPS) confounds the respondent's self and other-orientations, it was modified to measure both orientations on each of the 15 personality variables. Thirty-seven university students and their spouses were administered the modified EPPS. Their reliability was significantly higher than Edwards reports for his college student sample which was given his standard instrument. Also, the respondents were shown to have different preferences for themselves than for others, both over-all and for specific scales on the modified instrument.

摘要

由于爱德华兹个人偏好量表(EPPS)混淆了受访者的自我导向和他人导向,因此对其进行了修改,以在15个人格变量中的每一个上测量这两种导向。37名大学生及其配偶接受了修改后的EPPS测试。其信度显著高于爱德华兹对其大学生样本使用标准量表所报告的信度。此外,研究表明,受访者对自己和他人的偏好总体上以及在修改后的量表的特定量表上都有所不同。

相似文献

1
Self-other orientations and the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule.自我与他人取向及爱德华个人偏好量表
J Pers Assess. 1975 Jun;39(3):293-6. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa3903_11.
2
An assessment of the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule from the perspective of the five-factor model.从五因素模型视角对爱德华个人偏好量表的评估
J Pers Assess. 1992 Feb;58(1):67-78. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5801_6.
3
[Personality characteristics seen in the EPPS (Edwards Personal Preference Schedule) test--with special reference to student nurse personality].[在爱德华个人偏好量表(EPPS)测试中所见的人格特征——特别提及实习护士的人格]
Kango Tenbo. 1982 Apr;7(4):368-76.
4
Personality correlates of the Mosher Guilt Scales.莫舍尔内疚量表的人格相关因素。
J Pers Assess. 1977 Aug;41(4):375-82. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4104_7.
5
Asymmetry in judgments of personality: others are less differentiated than the self.人格判断中的不对称性:他人比自我的区分度更低。
J Pers. 2008 Jun;76(3):535-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00495.x. Epub 2008 Apr 8.
6
Performance of student nurses on the Edwards Personal Preference Schedule.学生护士在爱德华个人偏好量表上的表现。
J Psychol. 1976 Nov;94(2d Half):297-300. doi: 10.1080/00223980.1976.9915849.
7
What makes a hero? The impact of integrity on admiration and interpersonal judgment.什么造就了英雄?正直对钦佩和人际判断的影响。
J Pers. 2008 Apr;76(2):323-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00488.x. Epub 2008 Mar 5.
8
Learning styles of preclinical students in a medical college in western Nepal.尼泊尔西部一所医学院校临床前学生的学习风格
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2006 Jul-Sep;4(3):390-5.
9
Autonomy: a concept reconsidered.
J Pers Assess. 1974 Jun;38(3):243-6. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1974.10119970.
10
Reliability of the Interpersonal Perception Method modified for use with children.
Psychol Rep. 1974 Jun;34(3):1307-11.