Berendt R F, Schneider M A, Young H W, Frola F R
Am J Vet Res. 1979 Sep;40(9):1231-5.
The methods of aerosol administration of kanamycin and IM injection of the antibiotic were compared for their protection of mice and squirrel monkeys against Klebsiella pneumoniae respiratory tract infection. Mice exposed to LD90 of K pneumoniae at 0.5, 4, 24, 48 and 72 hours after they were treated with aerosol of kanamycin (27 mg/kg of body weight) were significantly better protected at all exposure times than were mice given the antibiotic (450 mg/kg) by IM injection. Squirrel monkeys given the aerosol at dose level of 11.25 mg/kg were completely protected against K pneumoniae exposure at 6 and 24 hours, whereas only one of eight monkeys treated with the same dose given IM survived the exposure at 6 hours and none survived at 24 hours. Antibiotic clearance curves indicated that kanamycin remained in the lungs at higher concentrations and for longer periods after aerosol treatment than after IM treatment.
对卡那霉素气雾给药法与抗生素肌肉注射法进行了比较,观察二者对小鼠和松鼠猴抵御肺炎克雷伯菌呼吸道感染的保护作用。用卡那霉素气雾剂(27mg/kg体重)处理小鼠后,在0.5、4、24、48和72小时让其暴露于肺炎克雷伯菌的LD90下,在所有暴露时间点,这些小鼠受到的保护均显著优于肌肉注射抗生素(450mg/kg)的小鼠。给予剂量水平为11.25mg/kg气雾剂的松鼠猴在6小时和24小时完全受到保护,抵御了肺炎克雷伯菌的暴露,而肌肉注射相同剂量的八只猴子中,只有一只在6小时的暴露中存活,在24小时的暴露中无一存活。抗生素清除曲线表明,与肌肉注射治疗相比,气雾治疗后卡那霉素在肺中保持较高浓度的时间更长。