Clark M, Benbow M, Butcher M, Gebhardt K, Teasley G, Zoller J
School of Electronics, University of Glamorgan, UK.
Br J Nurs. 2002;11(4):230, 232, 234 passim. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2002.11.4.10075.
This article, the first of two parts, presents the argument that a combination of efficacy and effectiveness is required to assess fully the impact of interventions such as pressure-redistributing beds and mattresses. The methodology adopted within a multinational, multicentre, prospective, non-randomized cohort study, designed to record the occurrence and characteristics of patients vulnerable to, or with, established pressure ulcers, is described. General demographic data and the characteristics of the pressure ulcers experienced by the 2507 UK subjects recruited to the study across four UK hospitals between July 1996 and May 1998 are presented, with pressure ulcers affecting 218 subjects of whom 100 presented with ulcers on admission to hospital. Fourteen subjects developed severe ulcers, while a further 24 were admitted with full-thickness pressure ulcers. The second part of this article will report further details of the characteristics of the UK sample. Future articles will consider the subjects examined in greater detail and will also discuss the combination of this dataset with similar data collected in the USA.
本文是系列文章的第一篇,提出了这样一个观点:要全面评估减压床和床垫等干预措施的影响,需要将疗效和效果结合起来考量。文中描述了一项跨国、多中心、前瞻性、非随机队列研究采用的方法,该研究旨在记录易患或已患有压疮患者的发病情况及特征。文章呈现了1996年7月至1998年5月期间在英国四家医院招募的2507名英国受试者的一般人口统计学数据以及他们所患压疮的特征,其中218名受试者患有压疮,100名受试者在入院时就已出现溃疡。14名受试者出现了严重溃疡,另有24名受试者入院时即患有全层压疮。本文的第二部分将报告英国样本特征的更多细节。后续文章将更详细地探讨这些受试者,并讨论该数据集与在美国收集的类似数据的结合情况。