• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Piver's radical hysterectomy (type III): Endo-Gia 30 stapler versus traditional forcipressure for resection of the cardinal ligament.

作者信息

Scollo P, Scibilia G, Nocera F, Ruggeri R, Caudullo S

机构信息

Department of Obstetric-Gynecology, Cannizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2001;22(6):423-6.

PMID:11874073
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Morbidity and costs associated with Piver's radical hysterectomy (type III) are noteworthy. The Endo-Gia stapler method for resection of cardinal ligaments can reduce duration of surgery and hospitalization, blood loss, costs and postoperative infection rates.

METHOD

Two groups of patients (homogeneous for age, weight and medical condition) were studied: one group was operated on using the Endo-Gia stapler method (n=52) and the other with the traditional forcipressure (n=13). The size of parametrial tissue removed, blood loss, duration of surgery, duration of hospitalization, cost of materials and postoperative fever were compared in the two groups.

RESULT

Mean operative times were lower in the Endo-Stapler group than in the controls (mean 180 min versus 220 min). Mean blood loss was 300 cc in the stapler group versus 450 cc in the forcipressure group. Mean cost of surgery (considering costs of materials, hospital stay. duration of surgery), was lower in the stapler group (3,095 euros) than in the group who underwent traditional surgery (3,434 euros).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest the Endo-Gia stapler method significantly reduces blood loss, operative time and cost.

摘要

相似文献

1
Piver's radical hysterectomy (type III): Endo-Gia 30 stapler versus traditional forcipressure for resection of the cardinal ligament.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2001;22(6):423-6.
2
Radical abdominal hysterectomy using the ENDO-GIA stapler: report of 150 cases and literature review.使用ENDO - GIA吻合器行根治性腹式子宫切除术:150例报告及文献综述
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1998;19(3):215-9.
3
[Application of Endo-GIA stapler in laparoscopic radicalcystectomy].Endo-GIA吻合器在腹腔镜根治性膀胱切除术中的应用
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Jun 23;100(24):1872-1876. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20190925-02112.
4
Radical hysterectomy with the endoscopic stapler.使用内镜吻合器的根治性子宫切除术。
Gynecol Oncol. 1998 Oct;71(1):50-2. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1998.5096.
5
Laparoscopic hysterectomy with the Endo GIA 30 stapler.
J Reprod Med. 1993 Aug;38(8):582-6.
6
Surgical stapling technique for radical hysterectomy.根治性子宫切除术的外科吻合技术
Gynecol Oncol. 1994 Nov;55(2):179-84. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1274.
7
Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type II-III) with pelvic lymphadenectomy in early invasive cervical cancer.早期浸润性宫颈癌的全腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术(II-III型)加盆腔淋巴结清扫术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Mar-Apr;12(2):113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.01.016.
8
Vaginal Closure with EndoGIA to Prevent Tumor Spillage in Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.阴道内切割闭合器预防宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术中肿瘤播散
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 May-Jun;26(4):602. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.015. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
9
Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Carcinoma: Emphasis on Nerve Content in Removed Cardinal Ligaments.腹腔镜保留神经的宫颈癌根治术:着重关注切除的主韧带中的神经成分
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2016 Jan;26(1):192-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000577.
10
Prospective randomized comparison of linear staplers during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术中线性吻合器的前瞻性随机对照研究
Obes Surg. 2003 Dec;13(6):855-9; discussion 860. doi: 10.1381/096089203322618641.