Soeno K, Taira Y, Matsumura H, Atsuta M
Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Nagasaki University School of Dentistry, Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Japan.
J Oral Rehabil. 2001 Dec;28(12):1122-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00756.x.
The current study investigates the influence of three dentin hypersensitivity treating agents (Gluma CPS, MS Coat and Saforide) on bond strength to dentin of two luting agents (Panavia Fluoro Cement and Super-Bond C & B). Sixty bovine dentin substrates were divided into 12 combinations of four treatment conditions (Gluma CPS, MS Coat, Saforide and control) and three adhesive systems (AD Gel sodium hypochlorite + Panavia Fluoro Cement, Panavia Fluoro Cement without AD Gel and Super-Bond C & B). After bonding the treated teeth to steel rods, 24-h tensile bond strengths were determined, and average values (n=5) were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Without application of the desensitizers, bond strengths of the two groups (Super-Bond C & B, 10.2 MPa; AD Gel + Panavia, 11.5 MPa) were comparable, and they were greater than the group bonded with the Panavia material with no AD Gel conditioning (7.1 MPa). Application of the Saforide ammoniated silver fluoride desensitizer reduced bond strength of both the Super-Bond and Panavia luting agents, whereas the MS Coat polymeric agent negatively affected bond strength of the Panavia cement only. The use of the Gluma desensitizer did not affect bond strength of any of the three adhesive systems, and the bond strength of the Panavia cement with the AD Gel conditioning was not reduced by application of any of the three desensitizers. The four combinations of two desensitizers (MS Coat and Gluma CPS) and two adhesive systems (Super-Bond C & B and AD Gel + Panavia) are deemed to be applicable to fixed prosthodontic treatment.
本研究调查了三种牙本质过敏治疗剂(Gluma CPS、MS Coat和Saforide)对两种粘结剂(Panavia Fluoro Cement和Super-Bond C & B)与牙本质粘结强度的影响。将60个牛牙本质基质分为四种处理条件(Gluma CPS、MS Coat、Saforide和对照)和三种粘结系统(AD Gel次氯酸钠+Panavia Fluoro Cement、无AD Gel的Panavia Fluoro Cement和Super-Bond C & B)的12种组合。将处理后的牙齿粘结到钢棒上后,测定24小时拉伸粘结强度,并通过方差分析(ANOVA)比较平均值(n = 5)。在不使用脱敏剂的情况下,两组(Super-Bond C & B,10.2 MPa;AD Gel + Panavia,11.5 MPa)的粘结强度相当,且均高于未使用AD Gel预处理的Panavia材料粘结组(7.1 MPa)。使用Saforide氨化氟化银脱敏剂降低了Super-Bond和Panavia两种粘结剂的粘结强度,而MS Coat聚合物试剂仅对Panavia粘结剂的粘结强度有负面影响。使用Gluma脱敏剂对三种粘结系统中的任何一种的粘结强度均无影响,且使用任何一种脱敏剂均未降低经AD Gel预处理的Panavia粘结剂的粘结强度。两种脱敏剂(MS Coat和Gluma CPS)与两种粘结系统(Super-Bond C & B和AD Gel + Panavia)的四种组合被认为适用于固定修复治疗。