Iwama Hiroshi
Department of Anesthesiology, Central Aizu General Hospital, Aizuwakamatsu, Japan.
J Clin Anesth. 2002 Feb;14(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00348-8.
To examine whether nasal bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) can be used as an airway during combined epidural-propofol anesthesia.
Prospective, consecutive case series study.
Operating room at a general hospital.
213 ASA physical status I and II adult patients undergoing lower extremity or lower abdominal gynecology surgery.
After epidural anesthesia, propofol was infused at 20 mg/kg/hr (P20) for 4 to 5 minutes followed by 5 mg/kg/hr (P5), and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) 8 cm H(2)O and BiPAP 14/8 cm H(2)O was applied. In clinical situations, BiPAP with respiratory rate (RR) 10 breaths/min was applied. Furthermore, tidal volume (V(T)) during anesthesia, the effect of changing pressure support levels, and evaluation of pressure-controlled ventilation without spontaneous breathing were examined.
CPAP resulted in a high RR, marked increased PaCO(2), and slightly decreased PaO(2), whereas BiPAP showed no change or a slightly decreased RR, slightly increased PaCO(2), and no change in PaO(2) or a great increase in PaO(2) with oxygen delivery. In clinical applications, similar results were found and anesthetic conditions were sufficient. Tidal volume increased after induction and maintained increased values under BiPAP 14/8 cm H(2)O. Of V(T) at 2, 6, or 10 cm H(2)O of pressure support levels, the 6 cm H(2)O was appropriate. Vecuronium injection showed a slight decrease and then increase in V(T) and PaCO(2), but the values were within normal (safe) limits. Respiration after rapid and high-dose infusion of propofol showed a markedly decreased RR, but the V(T) was maintained, and PaCO(2) and PaO(2) were at safe values. Rapid induction with 2.0 mg/kg propofol followed by P5 showed satisfactory results, in all but the obese patients.
BiPAP 14/8 cm H(2)0 with RR at 10 breaths/min during combined epidural-propofol anesthesia can be used to provide ventilatory support in lower extremity or lower abdominal gynecology surgery.
探讨在硬膜外-丙泊酚联合麻醉期间,经鼻双水平气道正压通气(BiPAP)能否用作气道支持。
前瞻性连续病例系列研究。
一家综合医院的手术室。
213例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级和II级的成年患者,接受下肢或下腹部妇科手术。
硬膜外麻醉后,以20mg/kg/小时(P20)的速度输注丙泊酚4至5分钟,随后以5mg/kg/小时(P5)的速度输注,并应用经鼻持续气道正压通气(CPAP)8cmH₂O和BiPAP 14/8cmH₂O。在临床情况下,应用呼吸频率(RR)为10次/分钟的BiPAP。此外,还检查了麻醉期间的潮气量(V(T))、改变压力支持水平的效果以及无自主呼吸时压力控制通气的评估。
CPAP导致RR升高、PaCO₂显著升高、PaO₂略有下降,而BiPAP显示RR无变化或略有下降、PaCO₂略有升高、PaO₂无变化或在供氧时PaO₂大幅升高。在临床应用中,发现了类似的结果且麻醉条件充足。诱导后潮气量增加,并在BiPAP 14/8cmH₂O下维持增加的值。在压力支持水平为2、6或10cmH₂O时的V(T)中,6cmH₂O是合适的。注射维库溴铵后V(T)和PaCO₂略有下降然后升高,但数值在正常(安全)范围内。快速大剂量输注丙泊酚后的呼吸显示RR显著下降,但V(T)得以维持,且PaCO₂和PaO₂处于安全值。除肥胖患者外,以2.0mg/kg丙泊酚进行快速诱导后再给予P5显示出满意的结果。
在硬膜外-丙泊酚联合麻醉期间,应用RR为10次/分钟的BiPAP 14/8cmH₂O可用于为下肢或下腹部妇科手术提供通气支持。