Barkway P
School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Nurs Inq. 2001 Sep;8(3):191-5.
In 1996 Michael Crotty published the text Phenomenology and nursing research in which he criticised many nurse researchers' interpretation of the methodology of phenomenology and their utilisation of phenomenology as a method for undertaking qualitative nursing research. Crotty's thesis proposes that the research conducted by nurses is not phenomenology according to the European tradition, but a North American hybrid. Subsequently, debate has occurred amongst nurses as to whether Crotty's work is a scholarly, reasoned critique or a severe, judgmental, fault-finding criticism of nursing research. Considering the increasing utilisation of phenomenology as a methodology that informs nursing research, this debate is an important one and has implications for the conduct of research. This article examines this debate and the implications of Crotty's work for phenomenological research in nursing.
1996年,迈克尔·克罗蒂发表了《现象学与护理研究》一文,文中批评了许多护士研究者对现象学方法的解读以及他们将现象学用作质性护理研究方法的做法。克罗蒂的论点是,护士进行的研究并非欧洲传统意义上的现象学,而是北美混合体。随后,护士们就克罗蒂的作品究竟是对护理研究的学术性、理性批判,还是严厉的、评判性的、吹毛求疵的批评展开了争论。鉴于现象学作为一种为护理研究提供信息的方法的使用日益增加,这场争论很重要,且对研究的开展有影响。本文审视了这场争论以及克罗蒂的作品对护理现象学研究的影响。